Viewing 15 posts - 58,441 through 58,455 (of 59,048 total)
Ah. Got it... very nice work around and thanks for the clarification on the xp_/sp_. The proc is actually listed as an sp_ in the Master DB but I guess...
January 19, 2006 at 7:42 am
I'm thinking that those extra services take up some of the memory that would normally have been available to SQL Server on otherwise identical machines so I'm thinking you're right.
January 18, 2006 at 8:30 pm
Like I said earlier... the hard knocks code will beat the pants off DTS either way. Thanks for the feedback Greg. You can get some extra performance out of SELECT...
January 18, 2006 at 8:20 pm
>>>These temp tables can then be cursored...
I don't think you understood... the whole idea is to get rid of cursors and other RBAR methods in SQL Server.
January 18, 2006 at 7:37 pm
>>But for this type of operation, I still think xp_execresultset is the best solution.
The original post was for "Eliminating Cursors" so I have to ask... how do you use it...
January 18, 2006 at 7:34 pm
Just my humble opinion but I need to clear up some of the myths associated with Table Variables...
First, table variables don't live in memory anymore than temp tables...
January 18, 2006 at 6:23 am
Thanks for coming back, John...
Yeah, I saw your original post where you said you had a table with all of the individual possible values. Your solution looks as though it...
January 17, 2006 at 8:08 pm
Greg,
I don't know if having the Primary Key on the last column will affect performance especially for CLUSTERED keys... I'd have to study the format in BOL a bit.
However,...
January 17, 2006 at 7:48 pm
Gail,
You wrote "ps, I don't understand your comment about pushing into a table without a pk. Best insert performance is a when inserting into a heap with no indexes".
Normally I...
January 17, 2006 at 7:45 pm
Then something else went wrong, Gail. Perhaps there was a cross-join in the code. Perhaps you had a bad connection (it happens). Perhaps the linked server was not setup correctly. ...
January 17, 2006 at 5:48 am
Not sure why that would matter at all but OK, whatever you say. I was thinking that maybe the servers had some different settings (like collation and memory allocation), a...
January 16, 2006 at 9:22 pm
Uh... if you're new, it'll take a bit of study on your part, but you may want to consider setting up "replication"... then, it's nearly "auto-magic" from there. The steps...
January 16, 2006 at 9:10 pm
Well, thanks Greg. I'm thinking that 35 seconds including the addition of a Primary Key isn't too bad (1.37 million rows per minute). I love it when DTS looses (and it...
January 16, 2006 at 9:04 pm
If you truly want to synchronize, why not just generate all the code for sprocs, views, and udf's in Enterprise Manager and let 'er rip?
January 16, 2006 at 8:44 pm
Ok, then... you ask a question, I bust a hump giving you a pretty good answer... did it work for you or what?
January 16, 2006 at 8:42 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 58,441 through 58,455 (of 59,048 total)