Viewing 15 posts - 57,361 through 57,375 (of 59,067 total)
I agree with John. It's easy... just tell it like it is... "Battle hardened SQL Server DBA with xx years of experience." You never said you had a certification or not. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2006 at 9:21 pm
Here! Here! I whole-heartedly agree. While I have seen a few folks (very few) with certifications that are actually good, they seem to be far and few between, at least in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2006 at 8:34 pm
Not nearly as stupid as trying to emulate spreadsheets in a database, eh?
Should'a listened to you on THAT one...
Thanks again, Serqiy.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2006 at 8:22 pm
Oh... when you said "Did you try to be dummy?", I didn't realize I had to be THAT dumb to get this to work ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2006 at 7:53 pm
Thanks for trying, Serqiy... the tab gets converted to "~WRF0409.tmp" when pasted back into a CMD window. Have tried ALT-0-9, Ctrl-I, etc... all have the same effect. And, haven't been able...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2006 at 7:41 pm
Great... thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2006 at 5:21 pm
This is just a bit of frustration talking but it's amazing to me that the original post asked for how to solve the "Min of 3" problem and changed to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2006 at 2:57 pm
| What I was wondering, was if anyone had already duplicated the functionality of Excel Solver in a way... |
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2006 at 2:49 pm
Not exactly true... the original post asked specifically for the following...
The analyst has used the Excel Solver to find the lowest value of a each number in a set of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2006 at 2:43 pm
Hi Remi,
Care to explain how you can expand your CASE statement to any number of columns to compare? ![]()
Justice and Remi,
The formula...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2006 at 7:32 am
Justice,
You're ok... The "example using the random numbers" is just a setup for test data to show the code works (as explained in the comments) and should not be included...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2006 at 6:24 am
"Just to minimise thinking efforts"... heck, Serqiy, what effort? I don't think they (the analyst's) thought about it at all
and the users that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2006 at 10:12 pm
You're welcome... thank you for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2006 at 4:26 pm
Me too, Serqiy... however, sometimes you just gotta play the cards you've been dealt.
Do you have a code solution for this that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2006 at 4:23 pm
Would 10000 rows in 16 milliseconds be fast enough?
Here's the test code and the demo of the formula...
--===== If the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2006 at 11:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 57,361 through 57,375 (of 59,067 total)