Viewing 15 posts - 57,271 through 57,285 (of 59,098 total)
Are you all set with this or do you still need some help?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 12, 2006 at 2:53 pm
Mind sharing the solution?
Also, using ISQL is "Death by SQL" because, compared to OSQL, it is severely deprecated. Change the ISQL to OSQL and you'll be much better off.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 12, 2006 at 2:49 pm
It may be a permissions issue... whoever you're logged in as may not have permissions to see '\\Servar2\test\xx.bak'. Try pasting that UNC into Windows Explorer (then hit CR, of course). ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 12, 2006 at 2:46 pm
Thought I'd throw a different slant at this one because it's an "open ended" report with no definite constraints on how many reporting periods may be requested within the start...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2006 at 8:37 pm
Sorry folks... I had posted some code and there was an error in it because the date part for weeks is acting very odd... trying to see what's up with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 11, 2006 at 6:47 pm
Looking at it now...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 9:17 pm
Robert,
In my haste, I missed the SPID thing. Clever to say the least. Thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 7:01 pm
If you run Serqiy's method, you can let it "crawl" all day... it will not interfere with normal daily processes...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 6:59 pm
There is another problem with Wrack's function, as well... it returns the date as an Integer... if you want to compare the date it returns to a DATETIME column, you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2006 at 7:36 am
I'm thinking that just a little irresponsible on your part. Good night, Lynn.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 11:26 pm
I agree that good teachers work themselves out of a job with their students... the point is that you misread the question and provided an incorrect answer. Thank you for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 11:19 pm
Good teachers are always responsible for the outcome...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 11:02 pm
Folks, go back and read Vladan's post... that's the only correct way to do it. He explains "why" quite nicely, too.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 10:59 pm
Careful... that, too, will likely cause a table scan because the column in the WHERE clause is contained in a formula...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 10:57 pm
Well, when folks post such detailed information about how their code works (very nice job, by the way), others take the code and just use it instead of analyzing it. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2006 at 10:43 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 57,271 through 57,285 (of 59,098 total)