Viewing 15 posts - 57,196 through 57,210 (of 59,070 total)
Still, Remi is correct... it will affect even a system time test because of the distribution unless you know for sure that the distibution of the actual data will be...
November 29, 2006 at 9:49 pm
NOW I remember why I never looked at BOL 2005 ... Microsoft pushes the .NET stuff down your throat even on simple documentation... BOL 2005 wants me to install the...
November 29, 2006 at 9:43 pm
Thanks for the tip... I've not seen BOL 2005 so I couldn't tell just by reading the article... I'll check it out...
November 29, 2006 at 9:23 pm
Thanks for the posted code.... still, why do you need to manufacture 10 rows for each row in the source table?
November 29, 2006 at 10:12 am
Yeah... and how many rows did you ultimately end up with?
November 29, 2006 at 9:01 am
Hang the typo's!! There aren't that many and it's very obvious what they are/should be. Heck, I've seen more errors in published books that have supposedly been professionally proof-read and...
November 29, 2006 at 8:39 am
This looks like a homework question and you are trying to get someone else do the work.
I'll drink to that!![]()
November 28, 2006 at 10:02 am
Steve,
I gotta ask... you're saying that you basically want to copy all of table A into table B 10 times (regardless of the loop you requested)???
November 28, 2006 at 9:53 am
Why?
Not trying to be a smart guy here but why do you want to do such a conversion? A lot of times,...
November 28, 2006 at 9:44 am
That, my old friend, is the reason I won't bet you... neither of us got this far being the fool... ![]()
November 28, 2006 at 6:48 am
Only after I know the answer for sure ![]()
November 27, 2006 at 6:34 am
Nothing a little self join correlated subquery magic can't fix... works in the grid or text modes...
--===== Supress the auto-display of rowcounts for appearance
SET NOCOUNT ON
November 27, 2006 at 1:07 am
| The alternative is to write a query instead an "on the fly" ad hoc mess. |
So, how do...
November 27, 2006 at 12:50 am
Are you sure that would be true in this case? A trip to the disk should always turn out to be slower than a relatively simple trig calculation...
November 26, 2006 at 10:48 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 57,196 through 57,210 (of 59,070 total)