Viewing 15 posts - 57,061 through 57,075 (of 59,070 total)
The SQL Server "Service" must be logged in as a user that can "see" those remote paths. As Lynn said, that also means that user must have permissions to see...
January 8, 2007 at 8:28 pm
Now, reverse the test... do it with the NO DROP first...
January 8, 2007 at 8:18 pm
First, don't use ISQL... it's quite a bit deprecated when compared to OSQL which you should use instead.
Second, yes, both your BCP and OSQL should be very close... probably the...
January 8, 2007 at 6:26 am
Of course, we could stop guessing if you'd post the code, Ashok.
January 8, 2007 at 6:18 am
Looks a lot like homework or a quiz... what have you tried?
January 7, 2007 at 11:07 pm
Outer joins are not always the culprit in slow SQL... joining a bunch of tables and returning to0 many columns usually is. Also, the reason why adding indexes isn't helping...
January 7, 2007 at 10:19 pm
Usually, the culprit is a CLUSTERED PRIMARY KEY... change it to non-clustered.
January 7, 2007 at 10:14 pm
If you want it to be unique across days (11PM today is NOT the same as 11PM yesterday)...
SELECT ...
GROUP BY DATEDIFF(hh,0,PinIssueDate)
January 5, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Ohhhh hold the phone right there... As much as I like Joe, his comments can really get out of hand... I don't care how good you are, no one has...
January 2, 2007 at 10:34 pm
Or...
declare @tabla table(field char(20))
insert @tabla values ('AABBZ')
insert @tabla values ('AADDZ')
insert @tabla values ('AA-EZ')
insert @tabla values ('AA--Z')
insert @tabla values ('AA++Z')
insert @tabla values ('AA+EZ')
insert @tabla values ('AACCZ')
SELECT *...
January 2, 2007 at 9:42 pm
John Rowan is correct about the existing rows... that's why some have suggested that the new column be a "calculated column" (see CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE in Books Online...
January 2, 2007 at 7:57 pm
Lee,
I absolutely agree with Brian on this one... I'm still looking forward to part 2, as well. Don't let the flamers deter you... think of it like an iceberg... you...
January 2, 2007 at 7:24 pm
Nope, with the second index in the code, I'm getting an INDEX SEEK on the OR method...
But I agree with the rest... why go through an index at all to...
January 2, 2007 at 7:24 am
You say you've been working on it for "weeks"... let's see what you've tried.
January 2, 2007 at 12:33 am
I don't know what either table has in it nor what either is used for and you left out the SELECT list so it's really hard to tell, but first...
January 2, 2007 at 12:26 am
Viewing 15 posts - 57,061 through 57,075 (of 59,070 total)