Viewing 15 posts - 54,976 through 54,990 (of 59,072 total)
Heh... like anything else, it only sucks when you don't know how ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 19, 2007 at 7:20 am
As suggested a couple of times... First SUM the minutes and THEN convert the result for display using one of the many methods shown.... you cannot aggregate non-numeric data with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 19, 2007 at 7:19 am
Yes... easily done... but you need to learn what ">>" means from the CMD prompt (or xp_CmdShell). Lookup "Using command redirection operators" in Windows help (under the Windows [Start] button...)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 19, 2007 at 6:55 am
Nicely done (as usual), Michael. Simple, straight forward, nasty fast...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 19, 2007 at 6:50 am
Heh... I understand what the rules are trying to say and (actually) very much agree with them, but I'm thinking that those definitions could be seriously misconstrued by those trying...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 19, 2007 at 6:41 am
Chris has the right idea with the Numbers table... except he didn't carry it far enough... we can do the whole table without a loop.
First, as Chris had in his...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 19, 2007 at 6:19 am
Setting a database's Auto_Shrink property to ON is probably not the best idea in the world. Something made it grow, you did something to reduce it's size, it's gonna grow...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 19, 2007 at 5:15 am
By the way, if the definition of "set based" is...
- it opens the recordset (table in this case) once;
- it accesses each value in the recordset once;
- for any row...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 10:15 pm
Heh... hell no
According to some of the people I work with, you need to rebuild the power company ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 8:33 pm
Heh... no such problems if you don't allow the coders to promote their own code and the DBA actually does his/her job...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 8:30 pm
Heh... you did that, too, huh?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 8:27 pm
Dunno that, Tracey, but I'm still looking for the URL to the original article you sited...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 8:25 pm
| Then we have some fairly quiet periods where we work on tuning things that don't work well. |
Heh.. thought...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 7:35 pm
Then, have the batch precreate a file with the header names (using ECHO) and use OSQL to call the proc using the >> DOS append symbol instead of the -o parameter......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 6:30 pm
Care to share so we might all learn something? ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 18, 2007 at 6:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 54,976 through 54,990 (of 59,072 total)