Viewing 15 posts - 54,631 through 54,645 (of 59,098 total)
You bet... thank you for the feedback...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 11:59 am
Could be any of a dozen different problems... you need to post the code you're using and the CREATE statement for the table you are importing to.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 10:56 am
Grant, I'm with you... I see no compelling reason for CLR's. My opinion, for the most part, for them being there is the same as DTS and Cursors... they...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 10:54 am
The easiest way to split limited (up to 4 parts) period-delimited text of this nature is to use PARSENAME. Look it up in Books Online for a full explanation.
Here's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 10:32 am
This is very nearly a duplicate post...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic410280-65-1.aspx
The only thing that means anything about performance for all the timers you have here is this...
Number of TDS packets received 28569 28569
Number of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 10:20 am
That information is available in Books Online ("Transact-SQL Help" under Help button in Query Analyzer). Lookup "Execution Plan pane" in the index...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 10:13 am
If you're asking how long we think it should take for you to process the 1.7 million rows that your are... we have no clue because we don't know what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 10:10 am
SELECT *
FROM yourtable
WHERE Address1 LIKE '[0-9]%'
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 10:03 am
You could have also used TRUNCATE table which resets the ID column back to 1.
But, even that doesn't "Fix" it... why are you using a cursor? Perhaps if you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2007 at 9:50 am
NEWID() won't guarantee it... it's only guaranteed at the full 32 characters.
What's wrong with this?
SELECT CAST(CAST(0x0013020061675035 AS BIGINT)+1 AS VARBINARY)
If you find the largest item in the column, just add...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 12, 2007 at 10:20 pm
I only see the column names being returned... no data types...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 12, 2007 at 10:04 pm
Notice, the answer above was almost as short and useful as the question... if you want a real answer, could you provide just a wee bit more info about what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 12, 2007 at 9:45 pm
Absolutely... 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 12, 2007 at 9:43 pm
If you want something slick to split addresses and validate them at the same time, look into a product called "ZP4".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 12, 2007 at 9:36 pm
Christopher Klein (10/12/2007)
Say I have a stored procedure that builds up a #temp...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 12, 2007 at 9:26 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 54,631 through 54,645 (of 59,098 total)