Viewing 15 posts - 53,821 through 53,835 (of 59,098 total)
And (missed it), Antares has even better reasons...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 1:21 pm
Heh... there's just a pot-wad of undocumented features and sprocs in SQL Server... most would warn against using them because if they're undocumented, they could disappear on the next service...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 1:18 pm
For me, it's because most things that you query are tables... for a view or a function, you might want to use the Hungarian notation to make it obvious that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 1:06 pm
Or, you could try posting in the "Access" forum 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 12:10 pm
Not odd behaviour... same as what happens with most numeric datatypes...
DECLARE @Datum2 INT
SET @Datum2 = ''
SELECT @Datum2
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:59 am
IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..##my_temp_table','U') IS NOT NULL
PRINT 'Table Exists'
ELSE
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:55 am
FYI... sp_MSforeachdb uses a cursor 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:49 am
Use WITH ROLLUP... search for the correct "NULLS"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:47 am
CREATE TABLE #DirInfo
(
SubDirectory SYSNAME,
Depth...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:45 am
you need to first EXPAND the precision BEFORE the operation, and then DECREASE the PRECISION when you're done....
Heh... and what better way to do that than to use FLOAT...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:21 am
b_boy (11/29/2007)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:08 am
"That's the way we do it here".
Heh... that reminds me of a saying...
"Even if the majority agrees on an idiotic idea... it's still an idiotic idea." 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:52 am
Heh... thanks for that, Jason. Hope a couple of other folks take heed of that little lesson...
In the meantime, what's the best way for me to get this dried...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:48 am
Heh... oh yeah... almost forgot...
"NO... I am NOT smarter than a 5th grader!" 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:41 am
Another surprising for someone result comes from simple primary school exercise.
X / N * M = X * M / N
Is it true?
( :blush: Wait a minute...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 53,821 through 53,835 (of 59,098 total)