Viewing 15 posts - 53,821 through 53,835 (of 59,089 total)
you need to first EXPAND the precision BEFORE the operation, and then DECREASE the PRECISION when you're done....
Heh... and what better way to do that than to use FLOAT...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:21 am
b_boy (11/29/2007)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 11:08 am
"That's the way we do it here".
Heh... that reminds me of a saying...
"Even if the majority agrees on an idiotic idea... it's still an idiotic idea." 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:52 am
Heh... thanks for that, Jason. Hope a couple of other folks take heed of that little lesson...
In the meantime, what's the best way for me to get this dried...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:48 am
Heh... oh yeah... almost forgot...
"NO... I am NOT smarter than a 5th grader!" 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:41 am
Another surprising for someone result comes from simple primary school exercise.
X / N * M = X * M / N
Is it true?
( :blush: Wait a minute...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 10:34 am
Jpotucek,
C'mon... I'm trying to help... I need the answers to the questions I asked above so we can avoid the problems you're having...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2007 at 8:48 am
Now isn't that odd... aren't those the same stages as a job? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 9:46 pm
Better think about DBCC UPDATEUSAGE once in a while....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 9:41 pm
Heh... I know the feeling...
Study sp_ExecuteSQL in BOL... it'll show you how to do exactly what you want.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 9:17 pm
It would be very helpful if you put this in just before the exec and printed out the result for us...
PRINT @strQuery
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 9:15 pm
Dang, Joe... between this and the NULLs problem, I'm thinking that you've landed in a doozy of a place. Who are these geniuses that you keep having fights about...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 9:08 pm
I appologize ahead of time for the layout of my code on this page.
Heh... if you took 5 minutes out ahead of time to fix it, you wouldn't have...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 8:59 pm
You might have a bit more luck getting a response to your posted this in the "Data Transformation Services" forum...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 8:56 pm
Yeah... that's the disappointing truth...
I'm actually on vacation, right now... I'll see if I can find that script at work on Monday... it's in a piece of automation I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 29, 2007 at 8:51 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 53,821 through 53,835 (of 59,089 total)