Viewing 15 posts - 52,036 through 52,050 (of 59,102 total)
Sorry... I can't read Spanish...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 1:13 pm
I'll throw in that just from a code consistency standpoint, WHERE IN should be rewritten to a normal INNER JOIN like Lynn wrote it.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 1:07 pm
You may have to do a DBCC UPDATEUSAGE on TempDB just before the sp_SpaceUsed to get that to change...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 11:42 am
Correct... not worth it. And thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 11:39 am
What? One row? You'll need to show me that URL... take a look at Books Online, instead... example they give uses SELECT TOP 1000 *...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 11:32 am
I'm not so sure that's true, Adam. I believe you can use OPENQUERY for this.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 10:52 am
Yes... there is another way using a triangular join... but it's horribly slow and relies on a unique or primary key and an order by...
To generate a running count in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 10:47 am
I'll see if I can resurrect the code I used tonight and share it here...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 10:13 am
Not without actually seeing the code...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 10:10 am
Thanks for the feedback, Shally.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 10:07 am
Heh... it wouldn't take as long to explain in person as it did here, Johan... I'd have just pointed out the couple of optimizations that everyone expects, explained that there's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 10:03 am
When all else fails, porkchops seem to work... 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 9:54 am
MattieNH (3/7/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 8:27 am
I agree with Matt... EXISTS in the form of NOT EXISTS is used to find something that has no match in another table. EXISTS by itself should probably...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 8:06 am
Brandie Tarvin (3/7/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 7, 2008 at 8:01 am
Viewing 15 posts - 52,036 through 52,050 (of 59,102 total)