Viewing 15 posts - 51,226 through 51,240 (of 59,091 total)
Forgive me for doing just a quick scan of the threads... couldn't you use the Information_Schema views for this?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Um.... if it's not a 3rd party application, check the "Model" database... sp_MSrepl_PAL_rolecheck is a sproc from the Master database and shouldn't exist anywhere else.
Compare what's in the sp_MSrepl_PAL_rolecheck sproc...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 8:41 pm
pauls2 (4/7/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 8:27 pm
mrpolecat (4/7/2008)
build your numbers table ( I call mine tally because Jeff Moden does:D.
Now, there's a heck of a compliment. 😀 Thanks, MrPoleCat!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Grant Fritchey (4/7/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 8:14 pm
Uh, huh... several different ways in the following URL along with some performance pit-falls to avoid...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Test+Data/61572/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 8:02 pm
It would be an aggregate query to sum all the CDRs (Call Detail Records for Telephone Billing) for a about 120 thousand customers in a 4-5 million row table. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (4/7/2008)
Yikes!Just put it in the Version Control script for database creation 🙂
Hi Steve,
As with Matt, I always appreciate it when you jump in on one of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 6:13 pm
Matt Miller (4/7/2008)
That level of detail ain't going to help you much.
Matt... thanks for the help. You're right, though... not a big fan of CLRs but could be convinced...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Matija Lah (4/7/2008)
Almost. If there's a view of the same name in the current database then the local view will be used.
Thanks Matija Lah... I agree... that's why it's never...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 2:49 pm
Matt Miller (4/7/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 2:47 pm
meghna.bhargav (4/7/2008)
In sql , how it can be done?thanks
Like I said in my previous post, I don't think spreading a single header over 3 columns can be done. I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 7:38 am
I don't know if it can be done in reporting services... header "cells" would need to be "merged" as if on a spreadsheet. I'm sure it can't be done...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 7:15 am
Sorry... I'm still not getting it and I want to make sure... you posted the following...
for item : A B
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 7:00 am
Sergiy (4/6/2008)
Don't remember exactly how many rows were...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 7, 2008 at 6:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 51,226 through 51,240 (of 59,091 total)