Viewing 15 posts - 50,806 through 50,820 (of 59,091 total)
Post what you have for the view already, please.
Strange that something should require a view to work...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Part of the problem is that you go back to delete the trailing comma... you basically do something like this...
DECLARE @somestring VARCHAR(8000)
SET @somestring = ''
SELECT...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2008 at 8:09 am
And, you need that in a file 100,000 columns wide, right? You trolling here or ??? I ask because you asked for comma delimited in the first post...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2008 at 7:39 am
shalini_pdi (5/2/2008)
I m getting error when i get the query based on some condition as i have mentioned in previous post
"I am getting the error as Violation of PRIMARY...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2008 at 7:10 am
Obviously, I don't have your data nor the query that calculates the age of the invoices, but if you use the output of that query as a derived table in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2008 at 7:02 am
Heh... NO! 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 9:11 pm
In SQL Server 2000, the absolute fastest way would be to insert the results of the query on the view into a temp table with an IDENTITY column and read...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 9:10 pm
I very much appreciate the feedback... thanks.
I understand where you're coming from... been there myself... been burned by that very same thing. Now, I assume that all code, no...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 9:00 pm
So, you're happy with the speed of a While loop? Might as well use a "fire hose" cursor if you're gonna do that.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 8:02 pm
It only takes bulk admin privs... if your DBA won't allow you to have it, (s)he can give you privs to run a job that uses a proxy.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Actually... no... not using Bulk Insert or BCP... they both require the headers to have the same number of delimiters as the "body" of the file even when you tell...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 7:52 pm
You bet... thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 7:40 pm
Obviously, you'll need to group by something else other than the invoice number... can't you group by the customer number of something similar that spans invoices?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 7:38 pm
No way to do it in a view in SQL Server 2000 and actually have some performance left. How many rows are you talking about?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 7:35 pm
Adding a computed column takes 0 ms and no extra disk space. If the column is precise and deterministic, adding an index to it will take about half an...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 1, 2008 at 7:29 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 50,806 through 50,820 (of 59,091 total)