Viewing 15 posts - 50,626 through 50,640 (of 59,091 total)
Just a thought... If you're coming in as a replacement for these DBA's and the replacement is not voluntary, I wouldn't expect a whole lot of cooperation. In fact,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 5:31 am
How many rows are being output by the query? Also, are you outputing the query to the screen? If so, why?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 5:27 am
Isn't CROSS APPLY just another name for "correlated sub-query"?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 5:16 am
If you must use Excel for reporting, why not write a couple of SQL Server views and use "Get External Data" in Excel to interogate the views and seemingly "import"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 5:13 am
The Tally table cannot be used to solve ranking problems because of the inherent cross-join. You've limited the cross-join, but only with a triangular join... half as bad but...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 5:09 am
srienstr (4/1/2008)
Jeff Moden (3/31/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 4:49 am
Nicely done, Ryan.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 4:35 am
You can if the in and out times are truly date times...
Please post some of the input data and the real table schema. Please see the URL in my...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 4:28 am
Deprecated... another word for "we're taking another feature away". I understand that deprecated aliasing by equality and forcing AS. Too bad... aliasing by equality made for some very...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 12, 2008 at 4:24 am
The real key is that the other folks are right... there should be a separate DB for each company. I've found that when the "higher ups" get involved, and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 11, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Another question would be... if you're converting TEXT to VARCHAR(4000), why don't you just pass VARCHAR(4000)? In fact, why waste time... do the conversion without a UDF...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 11, 2008 at 7:58 pm
heh... looks like homework... you forgot to remove the extra brace character from the example you copied out of Books Online. 😉
Also, you say this worked and now it doesn't....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 11, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Actually, the method you've shown won't work either... the INTO is in the wrong place. 😉 As a sidebar, you really shouldn't use global temp tables... to much of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 11, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Oh, I absolutely agree! Seems like MS has been making a lot of changes to things, lately... most of them boil down to removing some "feature". Case sensitivety...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 11, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Actually, I don't think it was a "simple mistake"... I think it was a cost cutting measure. It doesn't take nearly the code to make something case sensitive at...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 11, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 50,626 through 50,640 (of 59,091 total)