Viewing 15 posts - 49,141 through 49,155 (of 59,093 total)
cyndi.horn (7/21/2008)
Jeff Moden's Three Rules of DBA's.I, DBA?
Or, maybe get a little Edgar Rice Burroughs into it... "Ugh... Me DBA... you user!" 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 21, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Wayne West (7/21/2008)
Jeff Moden (7/21/2008)
1. A DBA may not injure data or performance of the data or, through inaction, allow data or performance of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 21, 2008 at 4:06 pm
Heh... yeah... I'm the same way... it's easier for me to remember an aggregate qualified by a CASE than it is to remember the Pivot syntax because it's so simple....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 21, 2008 at 7:29 am
jpowers (7/18/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 21, 2008 at 7:04 am
d_sysuk (7/21/2008)
shame I saw nobody else solve Part II !
No need to gloat... No sense in someone else solving it... you already did it! 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 21, 2008 at 6:05 am
Yes, you can... you'll loose performance, as well. 😉 It turns out that Cross Tabs are generally quicker than Pivots especially if you preaggregate the data in a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 21, 2008 at 5:43 am
Jonathan Kehayias (7/20/2008)
I still stand by the old rule of thumb that procedural business logic belongs in a middle tier outside of the database.
Heh... like everything else, it depends... it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 20, 2008 at 9:48 pm
That's a bummer... just goes to show what I've said in the past when people pitch a fit about using undocumented stored procedures... I tell them "Look! Even the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 20, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Instead of trying to reinvent the wheel... why not just use sp_MakeWebTask?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 20, 2008 at 9:11 am
So, use something better like Bulk Insert.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 19, 2008 at 6:12 pm
What are you trying to do with the CLR?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 19, 2008 at 6:05 pm
Ya beat me to it, Chris. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 19, 2008 at 6:04 pm
jayrsangani (7/18/2008)
i need this for text columns not for aggregatesthanx for the reply
Heh... trust me... with a little help from ROW_NUMBER(), aggregates are the way to go for this...
--===== Create...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 19, 2008 at 5:44 pm
By the way... Folks, say hi to Adam Mechanic... he's the guy that first introduced me to the idea of what I currently call a Tally table.
Thanks again for that,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 18, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Adam Machanic (7/18/2008)
Jeff Moden (7/18/2008)
Viswanath S. Dhara (7/18/2008)
I am trying to update a table using a correlated subquery.
Why? Correlated subqueries are a form of RBAR and can...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 18, 2008 at 7:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 49,141 through 49,155 (of 59,093 total)