Viewing 15 posts - 48,706 through 48,720 (of 59,099 total)
bluepaperbag (8/18/2008)
Yes, the 40 tables have different columns but they all have the same createdate and changedate columns which helps for the incremental extract.
The format has to be pipe...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 6:13 pm
If there's that big a price difference, I'm thinking that the OEM version may be the Standard Edition...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 6:08 pm
You bet... thank you for the feedback.../ 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:55 pm
pockeyfan (8/18/2008)
Hi, karthikeyan, thanksHowever, I could only get the " ed9xxxx@gmail.com" with your codes...
Did you try the function I gave you?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:47 pm
Shaun McGuile (8/18/2008)
Grant Fritchey (8/18/2008)
No kidding, drop the grenade & run...They could be doing something silly with reseed?
Thats not a grenade its a nuke......:D
COOL! Radioactive pork chops! I'm...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Peso (8/18/2008)
Haven't you read Jeff's article yet?There are even some small nice graphs illustrating the each and one scenario with the comparisons above.
Thanks for the plug, Peter...:)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:36 pm
Thousands... depends on the requirements of the problem. For example, most folks think you either need a Cursor or Temp Table to do running totals. Sure, there's the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:34 pm
... you did read the article on Triangular Joins, didn't you? That's how you recognize them.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/61539/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:16 pm
karthikeyan (8/18/2008)
That's a ticking time bomb in the face of scalability. It's known as a "Triangular Join" and you need to read about how bad they are...
How to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:15 pm
Like I said, the Tally table is unnecessary here. If you want to make something that will be programmable for this, why are you still referring to the OP's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Left my mindreader hat home... please post your code. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 4:47 pm
karthikeyan (8/18/2008)
And, sorry, the Tally table is not the solution here...
How and why ? Can you explain it ?
Yes... the OP gave us a table with numbers in it and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:20 am
Shaun McGuile (8/18/2008)
From my post before yours Jeff I totally agree.--Shaun
Spot on, Shaun! I missed that... sorry. Good to see I'm not the only one.
Now, if the OP...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:14 am
Please don't suggest replacing a cursor with a Temp table and While loop... they're the same thing if you use a read only, forward only cursor. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:11 am
Heh... that's 3 different opinions as to what the OP actually wants...
Hey! SQLIndia! Would you mind clarifying what you want, please?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 18, 2008 at 5:08 am
Viewing 15 posts - 48,706 through 48,720 (of 59,099 total)