Viewing 15 posts - 48,031 through 48,045 (of 59,102 total)
Heh... I find it very difficult to believe an article on performance where the author says "At first, we prepare a test table with 1 million records:" and then builds...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 9:21 pm
John, the article that Richard was referring to (thank you for the kudo, Richard) is located at the following URL...
[font="Arial Black"]The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 9:07 pm
Well done, Richard! 🙂
Just a suggestion... you may be able to get a wee bit more speed out of it if you eliminate as many of the math functions as...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 9:04 pm
If it's gotta be... correctly update "sequence" table would probably fit the bill here.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 8:39 pm
See the "performance" section of the following article...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 8:26 pm
No... you have the conversion on one of the columns in the Insert list... it has to be on the Date column in the Values list, instead.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 8:19 pm
rmechaber (9/30/2008)
Corollary: kick the trash barrel before sticking your hand in!
We used to have a saying in the Navy... buy lunch... leave the trash barrels alone. 😛
Anyway, thanks for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Dave (9/25/2008)
Wait for it...🙂
Heh... too easy... not even going to bother. 😛 I just shake my head and wonder. :Whistling:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Grant Fritchey (9/30/2008)
ruyfigueiredo (9/30/2008)
I have an database with 250MB and a Log File with 24GB.
After i reconfigure the Autogrowth i have...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:48 pm
You bet. Thanks for the feedback. Just curious because other folks have had the problem of finding "Example E" and I'd like to be able to better direct...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:43 pm
You bet. Thanks for the feedback. Does this mean you're all set?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:40 pm
Mark... you showed the naming convention for the directories... what's the naming convention for the file names and extensions themselves?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:39 pm
rbarryyoung (9/30/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:21 pm
You didn't copy the script correctly... you're comparing an Object_ID to a table Name in your from clause.
But, again, all that just isn't necessary. Look at my previous post.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Ummm... ok... can you use xp_CmdShell or sp_OA* routines?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 11:28 am
Viewing 15 posts - 48,031 through 48,045 (of 59,102 total)