Viewing 15 posts - 47,656 through 47,670 (of 59,099 total)
victor_bosc (10/23/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 23, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Technically, yes. But it's against the license agreement.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 23, 2008 at 7:44 pm
Yeah... but do you need to use DTS or SSIS or is doing it all in T-SQL without the use of xp_CmdShell ok?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 23, 2008 at 7:42 pm
Heh... dang managers all need to take a course in how to effectively plan and schedule a software project for success. 😉
Anyway, glad it does what you want and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 23, 2008 at 7:17 pm
Heh... cool! But, you don't really hate RBAR... or you wouldn't be using it. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 22, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Yes... short answer would be to use a calendar table to get the smallest non-holiday, non-weekend date that is >= 15 days out.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 22, 2008 at 4:32 pm
I swear I've done this problem on this forum before... :hehe:
Dan, in the GIF file example, please tell me why RowID 10 is NOT considered to be a dupe of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Oh yeah... I forgot to mention that, Matt. Thanks for the reminder,
Shifting gears a bit here... What a PITA.... I hate it when they do stuff like that... In...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2008 at 7:02 pm
You're welcome and thanks for the feedback. Just to be clear, it's a view... not a table. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2008 at 6:42 pm
I think it's because you've not identified the database where the table is at in your query. Try using a 3 part name for the table in th Query.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Dunno if it is... 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2008 at 6:24 pm
marcos jose (10/18/2008)
... and, why not change to sql server 2000?
Heh... Why not change to 2k5 or 2k8?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2008 at 11:10 am
FreeHansje (10/21/2008)
Jeff, the statement is as given in my first post. I get about 13000 1-row-effected messages in my...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2008 at 5:10 am
See? What a rich man I am to have such good friends as Barry. We've had more darned fun on these forums.
Thanks for the laugh, Barry. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2008 at 11:45 pm
rbarryyoung (10/20/2008)
Jeff Moden (10/20/2008)
1 archaic : a prolonged discourse
2: a bitter and abusive speech or writing
3: ironic or satirical criticism
... ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 47,656 through 47,670 (of 59,099 total)