Viewing 15 posts - 47,551 through 47,565 (of 59,095 total)
Sure... read the very message of mine that you quoted... lookup IDENTITY in Books Online.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Yeah... but they wouldn't like my title for it... "Ready, Aim, Fire all Pork Chops!" 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 9:39 pm
lindaotero (10/27/2008)
and when tryig to install sql 2005 "Standard" edition, all the options are gray ...(disable)... the oly one I can install...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 9:37 pm
Oh, my bad... low levels of Caffeine. You're correct, not a triangular join. Read too quickly. Sorry, Lynn.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Jeffrey Williams (10/27/2008)
In fact, using the above - the order of the columns returned is different. Why?
Heh... everybody say it with me... "Without Order By, the order of columns...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 8:55 pm
Lynn Pettis (10/27/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 8:49 pm
Garadin (10/27/2008)
Yes, that's all right, but if you make...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Isn't there a canned report you can get for the "top 10" longest queries just by right clicking on the database or server?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 8:24 pm
You have to plan on the unexpected... what happens if, someday, there's more than one operator? And what happens if you have to do a "bulk" insert of more...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 8:22 pm
smunson (10/27/2008)
Thanks for acknowledging. The only reason I chose to use a loop is because I just didn't have time to go look up the technique that selects...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 8:16 pm
The problem with even allowing such code to exist is that people will take any shortcut they can without regard to future performance. If they run across such code,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 6:52 pm
You don't need to include TransDate in that... just wasted IO and clock cycles. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 6:45 pm
Garadin (10/27/2008)
What you're basically asking for with this change is a script to promote laziness and inefficient coding practices that can cause all sorts of issues down the line.
I've agreed...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Lynn Pettis (10/27/2008)
Jeff Moden (10/27/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Chris (10/27/2008)
so how should i consider it .....
select isnumeric(order_number+'.do') from tbl1..
is this the syntax...
i dont understand this query
SELECT ISNUMERIC('3D2'+'.d0'), ISNUMERIC('3E2'+'.d0'), ISNUMERIC('1,000'+'.d0'), ISNUMERIC(CHAR(13)+'.d0'), ISNUMERIC(CHAR(9)+'.d0')...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 47,551 through 47,565 (of 59,095 total)