Viewing 15 posts - 46,546 through 46,560 (of 59,101 total)
You could also make a view from the two tables without much, if any, impact on performance because it'll just be doing the same joins that you're already frequently doing...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 4:41 pm
SELECT * FROM #MARKTABLE
WHERE MARK NOT LIKE '%[^0-9.]%'
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 4:38 pm
DOS batch job with a VB Script to popup an input window. Either that, or a "control" table that will remember the last run date.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 4:32 pm
bnordberg (12/17/2008)
Thanks Chris!that appears functional. Now to tune and see how it works with a few hundred million rows!
Why on Earth do you need to create what is essentially a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 4:30 pm
Chad Crawford (12/17/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 4:08 pm
Dejanette,
It would be a huge help to us if you'd post the actual data you're trying to sort in a readily consumable format along with a table creation statement. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 3:38 pm
I've gotta agree with the others... if you want to split out dates and times, particularly formatted dates and times, AND you think you shouldn't follow best practices by doing...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 3:35 pm
dphillips (12/17/2008)
Jeff Moden (12/12/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 2:44 pm
gcopeland (12/17/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 2:29 pm
psmg01 (12/17/2008)
Thanks for your reply.
Is there a url for a site, where I can generate sql for crosstab?
or How to write the query in my case?
I am...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 2:20 pm
BWAA-HAAAA! As opposed to what? Today's bloated "systems" and people who think spreadsheets and XML are an efficient manner of data transfer? Right... 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 10:31 am
I'll throw my hat into the ring on all that! There is no place where I could have had the opporuntity to learn so much nor stretch the limits...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 9:39 am
Lynn Pettis (12/17/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 9:24 am
TheSQLGuru (12/17/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 8:59 am
GilaMonster (12/17/2008)
r.hensbergen (12/17/2008)
Do posters think we're answering bots instead of real people?
I suspect that some do, or think that we work for SSC. I recall someone apologising after I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 17, 2008 at 8:49 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46,546 through 46,560 (of 59,101 total)