Viewing 15 posts - 46,111 through 46,125 (of 59,062 total)
([font="Arial Black"]Be careful folks... [/font]if you're easily offended, there are some places on the referenced sight below that will knock your socks off.)
Heh... Not sure how I got to the...
January 3, 2009 at 3:51 pm
I guess I do it backwards, then. I write out one "iteration" in regular code and test the willicurs out of it. Then, I just do a search...
January 3, 2009 at 3:32 pm
jacroberts (1/3/2009)
This method sounds like a bit of a dark art.
Oh, it absolutely is... one that is condemned by many "experts" who have yet to get it to break. ...
January 3, 2009 at 3:00 pm
And, yet, we go on without the ISO/IEC 9075 SQL2008 standard in SQL Server 2008 just as we have done without various other standards for zealots, lunatics, and database politicians...
January 3, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Yeah... you're right, of course... I didn't think about those particular things... I think it's because I dream of a database where developers won't be dropping indexes out from under...
January 3, 2009 at 2:14 pm
jacroberts (1/3/2009)
I take is that @PrevKeep variable is redundant as it doesn't seem to be used?
BWAA-HAAA!!! Well, at least I know someone read the code. Yes sir, I...
January 3, 2009 at 2:06 pm
RBarryYoung (1/3/2009)
January 3, 2009 at 2:01 pm
RBarryYoung (1/3/2009)
Jeff Moden (1/3/2009)
January 3, 2009 at 1:41 pm
jacroberts (1/3/2009)
I will test both your...
January 3, 2009 at 1:16 pm
Barry, coming from the likes of you, that's a totally awesome compliment. Thanks, ol' friend.
Just a hint about speed... I've found that SQL Server and I both have a...
January 3, 2009 at 1:07 pm
tfifield (1/3/2009)
As I pointed out the sequence table is ugly and only works for a single insert. It should only be done when there are interactive inserts done by...
January 3, 2009 at 12:26 pm
RBarryYoung (1/3/2009)
January 3, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Just a followup folks... I tried the original cursor/While loop based function on my box... now, keep in mind that it doesn't produce the required output... it just creates a...
January 3, 2009 at 12:03 pm
Phil Factor (1/3/2009)
My solution was almost identical, except that I did an explicit create for the temporary table. (I'm showing my age here; It used to lock system tables for...
January 3, 2009 at 11:47 am
OK... here we go. First, I'm gonna recommend that you add the following index to the WebLogEvents table... it will NOT interfere with inserts or deletes, will not need...
January 3, 2009 at 11:00 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46,111 through 46,125 (of 59,062 total)