Viewing 15 posts - 44,926 through 44,940 (of 59,101 total)
Bob Hovious (2/27/2009)
My war story is that our development group used to have a guy whose...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Bob Hovious (2/26/2009)
files that have been mangled by people who don't have the faintest clue what they're doing
I just have to ask, how much of your coding efforts are spent...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Bruce W Cassidy (2/26/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:19 pm
You're welcome, Tim... thanks for taking the time to post the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:10 pm
Mike, there's a whole lot of things that can make such a large insert slow. For example, a clustered index that's not quite on the right columns for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Grant Fritchey (2/27/2009)
I still think partitioning the data would be a better approach rather...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:00 pm
I'd still like to know why we're spelling out dates. What are the business rules that would require such a thing?
Also, just a friendly tip... you don't need a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Can you post the actual code you tried? The code you posted has no percentage calculations in it.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 5:47 pm
GilaMonster (2/27/2009)
Jeff Moden (2/26/2009)
[Great minds think alike... 😛 modeled very close to what the query designers in 2k and 2k5 spit out... makes it easier for "coders" to comply.
Not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Max (2/27/2009)
GilaMonster (2/27/2009)
Max (2/27/2009)
Always wondered of there was an overhead with using equal aliases though.No, but it is deprecated syntax
Pity, it's grown on me and quite like it, somehow...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 5:31 pm
Cool... thanks for the feedback, Roy.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 5:16 pm
Mark (2/27/2009)
Pretty much exactly what we do, I really don't like underscores...Seems to be a common convention, don't know where it originates.
Oracle... when code is autogenned, it comes out in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:28 am
Adiga (2/26/2009)
Jeff Moden (2/26/2009)
Can't use -E from a command prompt... only from SQL Server.
I disagree with this. I have tried using -E (Trusted connection) and it works well...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2009 at 6:22 am
Can't use -E from a command prompt... only from SQL Server. Where are you trying to run the OSQL command from?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 26, 2009 at 11:28 pm
If the nested proc only works on one row at a time... "Death by SQL". 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 26, 2009 at 11:23 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 44,926 through 44,940 (of 59,101 total)