Viewing 15 posts - 44,791 through 44,805 (of 59,101 total)
Bob Hovious (3/5/2009)
You and Steve and Gail and Grant and the other Gurus should start a SQL Server Central Certification Committee to promote higher standards.
Ya know.... someone was kidding about...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 10:44 pm
Bob Hovious (3/5/2009)
Any number of times I've seen the substantially the same question appear, just with different data and column names. Concatenation...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 10:36 pm
Michael Valentine Jones (3/5/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 10:30 pm
You absolutely deserve it.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Bob Hovious (3/5/2009)
You DID get the compliment from an MVP
I heard you were an MVP. What I meant to say was that I took more pride in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 6:08 pm
florian.reischl (3/5/2009)
Jeff Moden (3/5/2009)
Hey Flo! I have to ask... how did you get that picture of me first thing in the morning? 😛
Picture of you?? Maybe we are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 6:00 pm
"CostGuard" is a telephone accounting system. It had similar code to the NEXT_ID example you posted and it was, in fact, called "NEXT_ID".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 5:58 pm
musheik (3/5/2009)
yes, this is one time process. I will try your advice and get back to you
Heh... that's what the all say... it'll come back.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Hey Flo! I have to ask... how did you get that picture of me first thing in the morning? 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Another thing to consider is rebuilding indexes, especially wide indexes, will use quite a bit of the Log file and then release it (didn't say shrink). That's another good...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:28 pm
I've gotta ask, Ed... why do you need this type of denormalize output? What is that output going to be used on? I'm asking because I like to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Mohit (3/5/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:21 pm
florian.reischl (3/5/2009)
BEGIN TRANSACTIONUPDATE #id_tab SET next_id = next_id + 1 WHERE table_name = @table_name
SELECT @id = next_id...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:17 pm
Chris Morris (3/5/2009)
Jeff Moden (3/5/2009)
Bob Hovious (3/5/2009)
I just tested the function from that article ... it is SLOW!!!!9999 rows converted using that function takes almost 20 seconds!!!
Heh... I absolutely love...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Bob Hovious (3/5/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 44,791 through 44,805 (of 59,101 total)