Viewing 15 posts - 44,101 through 44,115 (of 59,097 total)
Bob Hovious (4/21/2009)
This beast features double-barelled carburetors.... errrr tally tables.... one with two columns, and nested CROSS APPLYs.
Can you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 11:16 pm
Milovan Banicevic (4/21/2009)
Can I achieve same result WITH NO CURSOR applied???
Absolutely... see the following article (Look for "One final split trick")...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/TSQL/62867/
... and the following post where many, many different solutions...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 11:12 pm
Paul White (4/21/2009)
On first look, the performance improvement is down to the QO choosing a much more sensible plan when a VARCHAR is used, rather than a MAX datatype....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 5:10 pm
David Burrows (4/21/2009)
Maybe someday, I can teach Jeff something.
Me too, I await that day also :w00t:
Like I've told others, I learn something new from each thread I read. I've...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 11:20 am
Hey, Steve... do they send you any kind of notification if an abstract for PASS has been accepted? And, considering things like agressive spam filters, is there a place...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 11:14 am
Edward Boyle (4/20/2009)
My strings usually have less that 20 "tokens"
Edward.... first, please understand that I'm absolutely NOT trying to be a wise guy here...
I've found that many folks use the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 10:02 am
RBarryYoung (4/21/2009)
However, in my experience there are three factors that are not well...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 9:52 am
Phil Factor (4/21/2009)
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost696606.aspx
Thanks, Phil.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 9:49 am
Phil Factor (4/21/2009)
For the particular string-splitting function, then the WHILE loop, and the Quirky Update solutions, behave predictably and linearly.
Sorry Phil... Haven't been able to keep up on this thread...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 21, 2009 at 5:35 am
Peter, don't be as bad as the cause. 😉 Lots of us got mad at him for all the name calling. And, the etymology of the word...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 20, 2009 at 11:16 pm
Matt Whitfield (4/20/2009)
But - I have to say it - I can't think of a way of getting round bruce.t's problem - which I personally found really disappointing!
I may...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 20, 2009 at 9:08 pm
I knew it would stumble on VARCHAR(MAX)... I just didn't realize how bad. However, on the thread that Flo has been orchestrating, he sent me a PM with some...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 20, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Manie Verster (4/18/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 20, 2009 at 8:37 pm
Bob Hovious (4/20/2009)
Can I declare my independence and be a country?
Thought you already had your own "state". 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 20, 2009 at 7:54 pm
I'd still like to see what the inputs and outputs of the binary to hex problem look like just to play...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 20, 2009 at 11:22 am
Viewing 15 posts - 44,101 through 44,115 (of 59,097 total)