Viewing 15 posts - 43,756 through 43,770 (of 59,101 total)
Ramesh (5/16/2009)
For advanced method (i.e. Special Update method), see this article[/url] by...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2009 at 9:58 pm
Heh... with what Sergiy said in mind... I've always been distraught over the idea of restarting serialization every year and the whole idea of using a sequence table to begin...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Lynn Pettis (5/16/2009)
O Please great and wise gurus, for what reasons may SQL Server not allow me to create a nonclustered index?
Heh... don'cha just love homework, test, or interview questions?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2009 at 9:10 pm
raj_143bhoomika (5/16/2009)
When creating a non clustered index on a column...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2009 at 9:00 pm
Heh... actually, now that I lookback at it, part of the problem was, indeed, an ORDER BY. It was actually a combination of both that killed our TempDB. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2009 at 5:18 pm
Since the sproc that updates the sequence table is so very important to eliminating the cursors in other procs, the fact that it has to be super fast, and the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 9:41 pm
Nah... "my mistrake"... it's ok.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Jeff Moden (5/15/2009)
Actually, I found a bug in spDBSys_GetTableRowKey_sproc... it will never produce an id of 000001...
In fact, it never produces a new id of other than 000000 even though...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 7:54 pm
Actually, I found a bug in spDBSys_GetTableRowKey_sproc... it will never produce an id of 000001...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 7:50 pm
praveenvelumula (5/15/2009)
Thanks for advice .. Jeff ,I will work on it .. I think i can do ....if not ...can i get back to you again ..........
Praveen
Absolutely....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 7:34 pm
RBarryYoung (5/15/2009)
Jeff Moden (5/15/2009)
Praveen,What version of SQL Server are you using? 2k, 2k5, 2k8?
Oops! I forgot to ask. Dang, I would have fallen hard on that one!
Heh... "Must...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 7:22 pm
praveenvelumula (5/15/2009)
Hi Jeff Modenallowed to change spDBSys_GetTableRowKey_sproc ... not many dependencies ...
Praveen
Perfect. I didn't mean to post just a quote and we can't delete posts anymore. SO,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 7:19 pm
praveenvelumula (5/15/2009)
to replace the Cursor ...........which i need to implement for better performance
i need...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 6:59 pm
Sorry, Praveen... I have another question....
Are you allowed to change spDBSys_GetTableRowKey_sproc so long as it doesn't break any code?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 6:38 pm
praveenvelumula (5/15/2009)
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - Enterprise Edition on Windows NT -Service Pack 1
Thanks Praveen.
The code has a sequence table in it instead of using identities... the way...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2009 at 6:25 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 43,756 through 43,770 (of 59,101 total)