Viewing 15 posts - 42,736 through 42,750 (of 59,102 total)
Mel Harbour (7/28/2009)
Don't worry - I do understand the slightly larger problem, and we're looking into what we can do to fix it in general, or find a nice compromise...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2009 at 10:46 am
Grant Fritchey (7/28/2009)
Jeff Moden (7/27/2009)
Grant Fritchey (7/27/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2009 at 8:58 am
Mel Harbour (7/28/2009)
I've edited the post to temporarily fix it, without deleting it. Essentially, if you want 'simple' blocks, with no code formatting, rather than surrounding your code with a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2009 at 6:28 am
Lynn Pettis (7/27/2009)
Kassondra is now on her way to Fort Jackson in South Carolina to start her...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 27, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Grant Fritchey (7/27/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 27, 2009 at 8:39 pm
Stephen Worthington (7/27/2009)
They are set operations (nicely illustrated in your Venn diagrams at...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 27, 2009 at 8:30 pm
phickey (7/27/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 27, 2009 at 9:29 am
Steve Jones - Editor (7/27/2009)
I saw this in my notifications, thinking, great, another fun complaint for Monday.And apparently you folks are getting ready for lunch. Enjoy!
Heh... not to worry... old...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 27, 2009 at 9:13 am
You bet, Chandra... thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 27, 2009 at 6:05 am
Peso (7/26/2009)
Or create the procedures and functions usingWITH ENCRYPTION
will make it harder for people to read your code.
Heh... just make sure that you have clear copy of the code stashed...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 26, 2009 at 3:03 pm
That would certainly do it. Just watch for problems on that if the old database was 80 compatible...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 26, 2009 at 3:01 pm
Thought I'd in throw an update to this problem...
If I may suggest...
1. We don't need RBAR to do this... no WHILE loops please. :sick:
2. We don't need 8 functions...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 26, 2009 at 2:04 pm
If I may suggest...
1. We don't need RBAR to do this... no WHILE loops please. :sick:
2. We don't need 8 functions to do this... that's a lot of complicated...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 26, 2009 at 1:14 pm
Lowell (7/26/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 26, 2009 at 10:36 am
Mel,
I broke it... any chance of you taking a look at the following, please. Yeah, it's the code window again but I broke it bad enough to make...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 26, 2009 at 9:54 am
Viewing 15 posts - 42,736 through 42,750 (of 59,102 total)