Viewing 15 posts - 42,601 through 42,615 (of 59,102 total)
Lynn Pettis (8/2/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 8:36 pm
As a sidebar... you might be a "novice_coder" in T-SQL but, from what I can see in this thread, you are not a "novice developer". Well done.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 7:25 pm
I also say that if you've broken it down to 10 procedures that there's nothing wrong with that... unless the procedures only handle one row at a time and then...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 7:19 pm
jqd2001 (8/2/2009)
Jeff (and I) was talking about Cursors and loops, not TVF's. ...there is no reason to believe that your only choices are cursor-based code or 1500-line procedures.
Barry,
For big...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 7:14 pm
jqd2001 (7/23/2009)
there should be no need for "procedural feature" nor a cursor to loop through rules no matter how complicated
Jeff,
In that sense, we will end up with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 6:48 pm
pandeharsh (8/2/2009)
Hi,I think I hv posted my problem ok like providing,structure of tables.
only thing is that i didn't populated my tables.
Then, as you have stated, "You have half understtod...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 4:32 pm
manohar (8/2/2009)
I have a table in which records frequently gets inserted. Around 5000 records per minute.
I am selecting data from that table once or twice per minute
Because of huge...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 4:11 pm
trayalacheruvu (7/28/2009)
i have around 500 tables in my database with size of 20 GB. Now i am planing to remove 200 tables from the database. after deleting the database still...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 4:05 pm
RBarryYoung (8/2/2009)
Oh Jeff, ... You might want to take this one ... 😀
By the way, Barry... thank you for the very high compliment about SSC and the Tally table....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 3:38 pm
I'm just going to skip over the words "unionize IT workers". It may be right for some but not for me, thank you.
And, yeah... I've pretty much always chosen...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 3:16 pm
novice_coder (8/2/2009)
Thanks for the help. Your code shows how to think column wise rather than going row by row. I am getting a hang of it now. And you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 3:09 pm
RBarryYoung (8/2/2009)
Oh Jeff, ... You might want to take this one ... 😀
For some reason, that thread hasn't been notifying me of new posts via email. I've responded...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 3:04 pm
David Korb (8/2/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 11:44 am
novice_coder (8/1/2009)
You are the man. Everything is going in SPs and I am scheduling the scripts calling these SPs.
Thanks for the help.
On RBAR: I guess I have to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 11:03 am
Heh... everybody is happy... 'cept me. 😛 No one answered my question. Here it is again...
Does SSRS have something in it to take an SQL DateTime and format...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2009 at 10:58 am
Viewing 15 posts - 42,601 through 42,615 (of 59,102 total)