Viewing 15 posts - 42,406 through 42,420 (of 59,102 total)
I don't know how much actual data you have, but rebuilding indexes is a fully logged task. It looks to me like the DB simply doesn't have enough room...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 8:04 pm
shannonjk (8/10/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 7:57 pm
Paul White (8/10/2009)
RBarryYoung (8/10/2009)
To clarify: HashBytes w/ SHA1 is nigh-unbreakable.
Hey Barry,
On the other hand, it is relatively slow, only works on strings, and returns varbinary(8000).
If the task is to detect...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 7:46 pm
saurabh.dwivedy (8/10/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 7:22 pm
Gabriel P (8/9/2009)
Jeff is always ahead of the game.
Heh... thanks for the wonderful compliment but that's not always true. Lynn will tell you that I'm way behind on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 6:52 pm
trackingraj (8/10/2009)
I love sql server very much.
If that's true, follow your heart. Become a "hybrid" DBA and do both jobs very, very well. There's only one way...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 6:10 pm
Heh... does that make you a Gigo-lo? 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 5:58 pm
jinette.andelo (8/10/2009)
yes, know this scripts, but How I do this in vbscripts?
What are you doing that requires this to be done from VBS?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 5:43 pm
saivko (8/10/2009)
Is there a good link you have in mind that talks about a sequence table? Or is it almost anything...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 5:42 pm
Ummmm.... does SQL Server's CHECKSUM use the SHA1 algorithm because I was talking about that CHECKSUM. Obviously that doesn't take 6000 to 12000 years to happen because I've seen...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 5:21 pm
GilaMonster (8/10/2009)
Sorry, but I'm going to greatly disagree with a number of these 'tips'
I have to agree with that. Gail's eval of some of the other tips is spot...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 6:28 am
17. CREATE TABLE vs. SELECT INTO - Select * INTO works fine for small tables, but when dealing with large record sets or long-running queries, it creates locks on the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 6:07 am
Heh... no problem, Paul. The OP's question of "you use with instead while loop,why?" reminded me of the very first time I saw such a thing except my question...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 5:48 am
For more information on how such a table as Paul speaks of works to replace a While Loop, please see the following article...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/62867/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2009 at 5:25 am
shannonjk (8/9/2009)
I am working on a copy I moved into my development environment and before I even started the code I added the indexes I figured were necessary 😉
In that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2009 at 8:33 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 42,406 through 42,420 (of 59,102 total)