Viewing 15 posts - 41,221 through 41,235 (of 59,102 total)
dm_unseen-571460 (11/10/2009)
For Running total see: http://shahamishm.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-to-do-running-sum-using-cte-sql.html
For finding previous row ordered by key_nr and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2009 at 6:43 am
ben.mcintyre (11/10/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2009 at 6:37 am
peter-757102 (11/10/2009)
Thank you for the very clear article and all the testing done to make sure that what you claim is 100% correct. But I wouldn't be me...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 10, 2009 at 6:33 am
In SQL Server 2005, you can use...
SELECT TOP (@NumberToReturn)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Thank you BOTH for posting your solutions. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 9:59 pm
Heh... I normally hate the use of semantics but I have to deploy them for this one. Please forgive me... :blush:
Despite appearances, ISNUMERIC is functioning properly even when it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 9:24 pm
[font="Arial Black"]"Make it work, make it fast, make it pretty... and it ain't done 'til it's pretty."[/font] --Jeff Moden
I not only test each stored procedure, but I test each...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 8:52 pm
Digs (11/8/2009)
Number of rows is variable.
Heh... I know that... what is the order of magnitude?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 2:11 pm
ta.bu.shi.da.yu (11/9/2009)
Jeff Moden (11/9/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Heh... this reminds me of how an interview for a history teacher might go....
Question #1. What was the name of the big, supposedly unsinkable ship that hit an iceberg...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 12:23 pm
It was intended only as posted... I wanted to know why someone wanted to know this level of detail especially since I'm pretty sure they can't change it or take...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 6:08 am
Lynn Pettis (11/6/2009)
Jeff Moden (11/6/2009)
Lynn Pettis (11/6/2009)
Jeff Moden (11/6/2009)
...What? No comments on the sample code I provided? I really thought you'd have more to add. 😉
I'm...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 9:03 pm
You may want to mention how many rows you expect per file and whether the content is zipped or not.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 8:59 pm
One now begs to ask... is it DECIMAL or INT? 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 8:02 pm
Heh... that's funny... I normally end up having to explain what COALESCE is to most developers both in SQL Server and Oracle shops.
If folks at the "enterprise level" have to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 41,221 through 41,235 (of 59,102 total)