Viewing 15 posts - 41,191 through 41,205 (of 59,069 total)
In SQL Server 2005, you can use...
SELECT TOP (@NumberToReturn)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Thank you BOTH for posting your solutions. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 9:59 pm
Heh... I normally hate the use of semantics but I have to deploy them for this one. Please forgive me... :blush:
Despite appearances, ISNUMERIC is functioning properly even when it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 9:24 pm
[font="Arial Black"]"Make it work, make it fast, make it pretty... and it ain't done 'til it's pretty."[/font] --Jeff Moden
I not only test each stored procedure, but I test each...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 8:52 pm
Digs (11/8/2009)
Number of rows is variable.
Heh... I know that... what is the order of magnitude?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 2:11 pm
ta.bu.shi.da.yu (11/9/2009)
Jeff Moden (11/9/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Heh... this reminds me of how an interview for a history teacher might go....
Question #1. What was the name of the big, supposedly unsinkable ship that hit an iceberg...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 12:23 pm
It was intended only as posted... I wanted to know why someone wanted to know this level of detail especially since I'm pretty sure they can't change it or take...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 9, 2009 at 6:08 am
Lynn Pettis (11/6/2009)
Jeff Moden (11/6/2009)
Lynn Pettis (11/6/2009)
Jeff Moden (11/6/2009)
...What? No comments on the sample code I provided? I really thought you'd have more to add. 😉
I'm...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 9:03 pm
You may want to mention how many rows you expect per file and whether the content is zipped or not.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 8:59 pm
One now begs to ask... is it DECIMAL or INT? 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 8:02 pm
Heh... that's funny... I normally end up having to explain what COALESCE is to most developers both in SQL Server and Oracle shops.
If folks at the "enterprise level" have to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 6:22 pm
I agree... The occasional properly written indexed view or Divide'n'Conquer stored procedure is frequently the only denormalization needed and it can be done quite effeciently without setting up a data...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 5:08 pm
Jack Corbett (11/7/2009)
Grant Fritchey (11/7/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 4:59 pm
becklery (11/8/2009)
Hi, eseosaoregie.In my opinion, maybe you can use RAQ Report to solve your problem.
As I know, it allows users to set format for data easily.
Regards,
becklery.
Heh... first Dassin, now you....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 8, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 41,191 through 41,205 (of 59,069 total)