Viewing 15 posts - 37,531 through 37,545 (of 59,072 total)
True enough and good advice, Joe. The only time I see someone making the mistake of dividing MONEY by MONEY is when trying to determine quantity from a total...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 3:19 pm
So far as the 1950's mind set goes... I use it all the time because sometimes the old stuff is the good stuff. Stop and think about it... the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 12:07 pm
It actually does matter a bit especially when it comes to formatting things like dates. SQL Server doesn't have much of chance of formatting dates correctly on a global...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 12:04 pm
I can certainly understand that bit of paranoia but consider this... the quirky update has survived all hot fixes, all CU's, all SP's, and all revisions including the major engine...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 11:53 am
Joe Celko (7/22/2010)
brian.cook (7/22/2010)
Thanks, I knew it would be something simple!
Actually, using the proprietary MONEY is a huge problem. It does not divide or multiply correctly. It does...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 11:40 am
kscott-851323 (7/22/2010)
I have multiple SSIS packages importing data from flat files that are tab delimited. The issue I am having is the source files column position can change without...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 11:35 am
sturner (7/22/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 11:32 am
You also have to think about licensing costs which may or may not be at the core level.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 11:23 am
Chris Morris-439714 (7/21/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 11:06 am
peter-757102 (7/22/2010)
Mike C (7/21/2010)
Jeff Moden (7/21/2010)
Mike C (7/20/2010)
I'll have to look a little closer at that one tomorrow. Is multirow variable aggregation as unsafe as multirow string concatenation?
Gosh, Mike,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 8:04 am
Mike C (7/21/2010)
Jeff Moden (7/21/2010)
Mike C (7/20/2010)
I'll have to look a little closer at that one tomorrow. Is multirow variable aggregation as unsafe as multirow string concatenation?
Gosh, Mike, I'm...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 8:00 am
Steve Jones,
If you see this, I believe this article needs an "Interesting Discussion" flag.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 7:35 am
Mike Carey-249880 (7/22/2010)
would like to see how these queries perform using CTE instead
Heh... so write the CTE's and let's see the test results, Mike. The author did provide the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 7:23 am
I agree with Johannes Krackowizer... the two queries are not the same. The correlated subquery is effectively an outer join. After a bit of repair to make both...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 7:05 am
glen.Gorman (7/22/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 22, 2010 at 6:50 am
Viewing 15 posts - 37,531 through 37,545 (of 59,072 total)