Viewing 15 posts - 36,346 through 36,360 (of 59,102 total)
sturner (10/19/2010)
Just so the original poster doesn't think I'm a grouch and since others did point a few of the more obvious problems, I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:59 pm
gah (10/19/2010)
CELKO (10/18/2010)
1) Learn the differences between rows and records, columns and fields; it will help.
Apologies for going off topic here, but I am confused by this statement above.
BOL states...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/21/2010)
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
The current SQL development model is to address a small number of main product features in each new major release. The...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:33 pm
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
Gianluca Sartori (9/21/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:27 pm
Gianluca Sartori (9/21/2010)
Paul White NZ (9/20/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (9/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:25 pm
mm.sailaja (10/18/2010)
I know that a table is an unordered. Order by clause gives us the result in a sorted manner. I don't want the result in a sorted order....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2010 at 5:48 am
gunapriyan (10/17/2010)
Thanks for your reply.
Actually I am developing a software with the help of VB 6.0 and SQL Server 2005.
In Date Part, Initially i have put DateTime Picker...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2010 at 5:43 am
Paul White NZ (10/18/2010)
SELECT *
FROM #membership...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2010 at 5:10 am
Dave Ballantyne (10/18/2010)
I would be interested in comparative performance over a larger dataset. 😉
No problem. Here's some test data...
--===== Expand the test data using "lasagne" copies of the original...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 18, 2010 at 5:06 am
SQL* (10/17/2010)
How to make use of UDF or subquery?Which is better one with performance considerations?
thanks
"It Depends". You have to test each way based on the situation you're trying...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2010 at 11:07 pm
My recommendation is to lookup the word REPLACE in Books Online. It'll show you how to easily do such a thing. I'd show you the actual code but...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2010 at 11:02 pm
Although having two systems come up with the same GUID is a bit like having two comets appear in the same mile across 14 quadrillion Milky Way galaxies, it can...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2010 at 10:57 pm
Eric Russell 13013 (10/12/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2010 at 10:51 pm
Grant Fritchey (10/12/2010)
They should be used where appropriate...
I apologize for puting you on the spot but what do you consider an appropriate use for them is especially since even MS...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2010 at 10:49 pm
The answer is the same answer as to anything else... "It Depends".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2010 at 10:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 36,346 through 36,360 (of 59,102 total)