Viewing 15 posts - 35,626 through 35,640 (of 59,099 total)
free_mascot (9/17/2009)
If I am not wrong in India at present you can ask around 20% more on the currnet salary.But still Depend on Company, requirement, roles & responsibilities etc....
WHAT "current...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 8:43 pm
Stefan Krzywicki (12/20/2010)
WayneS (12/20/2010)
Ray K (12/20/2010)
Celko warning alert
Yeah, I really liked how the OP pointed out that all Celko's assumptions were wrong. He seems...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 8:41 pm
bhutchin (12/20/2010)
Charles - Thank you very much. This is exactly what I was looking for.
@bhutchin,
I'm asking for reasons of performance, present or future. How many rows do you have...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 8:37 pm
Matt Miller (#4) (12/20/2010)
Wildcat (12/20/2010)
BTW, how could a NOLOCK hint to the target table on the DELETE or UPDATE statement?...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 8:27 pm
Also, if you do go to a "BIT" map on this, you should really consider a binary numbering scheme to support actualy "Bit Level Math". 1 = CAUCASIAN, 2...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 8:13 pm
torpkev (12/20/2010)
I need to translate this into a single column...
Heh.. your request has people speaking of BIT maps, Cursors, and other basic "Worlds-of-Pain" . With that in mind, would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 8:09 pm
CELKO (12/20/2010)
Can you be more vague ? 😀
Heh... on that subject, you said a while back that you were working on the 2nd edition of the "Trees and Hierarchies in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 8:01 pm
Satishsingh9080 (12/20/2010)
how to use if-else condition in store procedure with insert,update,delete,reader with exampleplease rply this example
Once you've read the link that Sean gave you, you may actually want to try...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 7:59 pm
pankaj.nainu1 (12/19/2010)
Ooookkkkk... so why the heck do you need error prone sequence logic in a RBAR trigger if you have an identity column in the table? This makes no sense...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 9:06 am
Mad Myche (12/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2010 at 9:04 am
pankaj.nainu1 (12/19/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 19, 2010 at 11:31 pm
Perfect. Thanks for the feedback. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 19, 2010 at 11:28 pm
hoanglong88i (12/16/2010)
Hello everyone,My trouble is that I have objects stored as date type, not datetime:
Gosh... it seems to me that you've correctly identified the real problem... what keeps you from...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 19, 2010 at 10:56 pm
MonsterRocks (12/14/2010)
TO_DATE('11/17/2005 20:51:27', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')above function in Oracle.. wht is the equavalent in sql server for the format of date 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS' ?
any help pls?
I know this post is several...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 19, 2010 at 4:51 pm
brindaam (12/13/2010)
I have two queries, say for example
Select distinct 0 parent_id, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(
ORDER BY Column2_Desc ) AS 'ID', Column2_Desc
From table1
Union
Select distinct 0 parent_id, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(
ORDER BY Column2_Desc ) AS 'ID',...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 19, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 35,626 through 35,640 (of 59,099 total)