Viewing 15 posts - 35,161 through 35,175 (of 59,099 total)
JJ B (2/3/2011)
JJ B. If you're not currently using a loop or the method in the article, what are you using?
I'll tell ya, but you have to be kind (not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:54 am
UMG Developer (2/3/2011)
Jeff Moden (2/2/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:47 am
Craig Farrell (2/3/2011)
Hm, you appear to have hit on something here... especially depending on the indexing.Using this new benchmarking code:
Wow! Lots'o code! What conclusion do you draw from...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:38 am
drew.allen (2/1/2011)
Jeff Moden (2/1/2011)
drew.allen (1/31/2011)
Craig Farrell (1/31/2011)
After having done some other tests, this method seems to be the quickest, especially if you have a solid index on Item/ChangePriceDate
My tests indicate...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:35 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (2/3/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:23 am
Lynn Pettis (2/3/2011)
EDIT: For those interested, the links above are broken.
Probably missing rather than broken......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:17 am
timothyawiseman (2/1/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 7:07 am
Roy Ernest (1/31/2011)
Hi Jeff, Great article as usual. 🙂
Hi Roy! Thanks for the read and the comment. Always a pleasure.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:59 am
Thanks for the feedback, Craig. Yep... not that it matters but I agree with that justification. Please understand that, considering the source, I just had to ask. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:55 am
GilaMonster (2/3/2011)
Tom Brown (2/3/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:37 am
mmarovic (2/2/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:32 am
Brandie Tarvin (2/1/2011)
GSquared (2/1/2011)
Stefan Krzywicki (2/1/2011)
Brandie Tarvin (2/1/2011)
CELKO (1/31/2011)
Successful projects start on lesser SQLs (even ACCESS ) then have to move to DB2, Oracle, Teradata or whatever.
Including Access? What other...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 12:35 am
CELKO (1/31/2011)
I do believe in portable SQL; I earn a living from it . Most ports are from release(n) to release(n+1) of the same SQL product.
That, good sir, has been...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 12:23 am
mlbauer (1/25/2011)
good question. The short answer is: We know our data will grow. We want to do our current tasks in the future, so we want 10x performance and capacity....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 12:06 am
GSquared (2/2/2011)
Jeff Moden (2/1/2011)
GSquared (2/1/2011)
select *
from MyTable
where ip =...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 2, 2011 at 11:56 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 35,161 through 35,175 (of 59,099 total)