Viewing 15 posts - 35,161 through 35,175 (of 59,102 total)
dajonx (2/1/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 3:53 pm
Oddly enough, I haven't used MERGE in 2k8, yet. But, I believe you'll still need to make that query dynamic SQL using a variable for the USING table name.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 7:05 am
parmar.randheer11 (2/3/2011)
I donβt want to take others opportunity π I am not job less :-). I know some answers are not up to marks I am correcting those and definitely...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:58 am
JJ B (2/3/2011)
JJ B. If you're not currently using a loop or the method in the article, what are you using?
I'll tell ya, but you have to be kind (not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:54 am
UMG Developer (2/3/2011)
Jeff Moden (2/2/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:47 am
Craig Farrell (2/3/2011)
Hm, you appear to have hit on something here... especially depending on the indexing.Using this new benchmarking code:
Wow! Lots'o code! What conclusion do you draw from...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:38 am
drew.allen (2/1/2011)
Jeff Moden (2/1/2011)
drew.allen (1/31/2011)
Craig Farrell (1/31/2011)
After having done some other tests, this method seems to be the quickest, especially if you have a solid index on Item/ChangePriceDate
My tests indicate...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:35 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (2/3/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:23 am
Lynn Pettis (2/3/2011)
EDIT: For those interested, the links above are broken.
Probably missing rather than broken......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 4, 2011 at 6:17 am
timothyawiseman (2/1/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 7:07 am
Roy Ernest (1/31/2011)
Hi Jeff, Great article as usual. π
Hi Roy! Thanks for the read and the comment. Always a pleasure.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:59 am
Thanks for the feedback, Craig. Yep... not that it matters but I agree with that justification. Please understand that, considering the source, I just had to ask. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:55 am
GilaMonster (2/3/2011)
Tom Brown (2/3/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:37 am
mmarovic (2/2/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 6:32 am
Brandie Tarvin (2/1/2011)
GSquared (2/1/2011)
Stefan Krzywicki (2/1/2011)
Brandie Tarvin (2/1/2011)
CELKO (1/31/2011)
Successful projects start on lesser SQLs (even ACCESS ) then have to move to DB2, Oracle, Teradata or whatever.
Including Access? What other...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 3, 2011 at 12:35 am
Viewing 15 posts - 35,161 through 35,175 (of 59,102 total)