Viewing 15 posts - 34,621 through 34,635 (of 59,099 total)
The forums are somewhat out of the order one might expect and you may have simply missed it. Here's the link to the 7/2000 forum.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Group406.aspx
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2011 at 11:01 am
mtillman-921105 (3/14/2011)
Jeff Moden (3/11/2011)
mtillman-921105 (3/11/2011)
Also, you should rewrite the query to use an INNER JOIN rather than the older way its using more than one table.
There's no performance gain in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2011 at 9:19 am
Hi Jason. Thank you very much for the high praise. :blush: I do my best and the good folks who engage in the discussions on any article are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2011 at 9:05 am
BWAA-HAA!!! Great minds DO think alike! Sorry to steal your thunder, Wayne. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2011 at 9:02 am
Thanks, Peter. I've brought all guns to bear on the new splitter article so that shouldn't be very much longer.
As a side bar... MAN! I've got a lot...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2011 at 8:58 am
BWAA-HAA!!!! As your signature line says, I can't explain Twitter... so I don't use it. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 9:11 pm
Don't forget to update only where the Tax column is NULL so previous rows at possibly different tax rates aren't updated.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 9:10 pm
Boy Howdy! Do I ever have an appreciation for all that. I did a 4 year stint in a mixed environment of T-SQL and PL-SQL. Like you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 9:04 pm
Craig Farrell (3/13/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 8:59 pm
josetur12 (3/13/2011)
Thank you all again. WayneS' solution works.
If you have the data to exercise Wayne's good solution, you might want to look into what a BCP format file does...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 8:45 pm
Lynn Pettis (3/13/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 8:21 pm
Lynn Pettis (3/13/2011)
Jeff Moden (3/13/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 8:17 pm
I'm just having a bit of fun with this data because I never worked with double-parent data before. Here's the code I'm using. It's just a reformatted copy...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 8:15 pm
Wup-up-OH!! I get it and learned something very new. The data is, in fact, a DAG but it sure didn't look like it. What's cool about all...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 6:13 pm
My problem wasn't with making a hierarchical query according to BOL... my problem is that the data the OP provided is cyclic and the examples in BOL don't show how...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2011 at 5:30 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 34,621 through 34,635 (of 59,099 total)