Viewing 15 posts - 34,036 through 34,050 (of 59,099 total)
This thread has indeed been a pleasure. Not only did I get a great response to the article, but we've collectively gotten a great enhancement to the original code...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 7, 2011 at 10:54 am
rmechaber (5/6/2011)
Jeff Moden, February 2009, http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost652105.aspx:
With the exception of RegEx, damned near all CLR's are simply not the right way to do it.
Jeff...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 6, 2011 at 9:45 pm
Agh! Sorry for my absence, folks. Thank all of you for covering for me. I haven't tested them for myself, yet, but Peter's modifications make a whole...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 6, 2011 at 9:21 pm
bimplebean (5/5/2011)
I just created a database with views that point to tables in production!
If, by chance, users are allowed to write their own reports against such things, you may be...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 5, 2011 at 1:59 pm
gary.rumble (5/5/2011)
My sincere apologies for wasting your time.
I appreciate your humility, but things like that just can't be classified as a waste of time, Gary. What if your code...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 5, 2011 at 12:53 pm
I don't know much about how you pass things (ie: variables, etc) to reports in SSRS but it seems to me that you'd only need to include a variable in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 5, 2011 at 7:33 am
Sorry... I didn't forget you... I just got busy. I'll be back.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 5, 2011 at 6:45 am
mmontero (5/4/2011)
Possible in 1 SQL statement?
The answer to that question is almost always "Yes". Now, please tell us why you think you need it to be a single query,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 5, 2011 at 12:34 am
jai_422 (5/4/2011)
We are using SQL Server 2005 Enterprise edition with SP4 installed on it. Actually its our reporting server.
Every month we...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 5, 2011 at 12:32 am
I may have missed it in the posts above... forgive me if I did.
If you have a SAN, it frequently comes with (or is an optional purchase that's well worth...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 5, 2011 at 12:29 am
Agh... I ran into a glitch with Peter's code and I sent it back to him. No more tests tonight.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2011 at 11:37 pm
WayneS (5/4/2011)
Jeff Moden (5/4/2011)
Oh... and the dust bunnies said they made a new batch and it's in the freezer as we speak. Gotta love courteous dust bunnies. 😀
They said...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2011 at 11:35 pm
WayneS (5/4/2011)
How did Peso's splitter compare? He usually has some wickedly fast routines...
Dang it! I knew I was forgetting something! I'll be back.
Oh... and the dust...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2011 at 10:05 pm
Code for the tests that produced the data for the above charts is attached to this post.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2011 at 10:02 pm
Here are the runs using random elements for 1 to 10 characters in size with the first chart showing just 1 to 50 elements per row and the second chart...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2011 at 9:35 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 34,036 through 34,050 (of 59,099 total)