Viewing 15 posts - 33,526 through 33,540 (of 59,099 total)
We're good now. Steve Jones and one of the Developers were able to recover the article in it's entirety. None of us know what happened for sure.
Thank you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 22, 2011 at 5:22 pm
Craig Farrell (6/21/2011)
Jeff Moden (6/21/2011)
toddasd (6/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 22, 2011 at 9:27 am
rmechaber (6/22/2011)
BUT: doesn't this tie all non-sysadmin execution of xp_cmdshell to that proxy account?
Yes it absolutely does... just not the way that most people have been led to believe mostly...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 22, 2011 at 9:14 am
Craig Farrell (6/22/2011)
Thankfully, I'm not wearing britches... so I don't care.
Ummmm.... and you're at work? Now I'm the one that's skeered. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 22, 2011 at 8:57 am
opc.three (6/22/2011)
Craig Farrell (6/22/2011)
For anyone following along with the Level II masquerading as a III, here's my next hint for research:
With Sommarskog's help
Hey, I resemble that remark 😀 and if...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 22, 2011 at 8:52 am
rmechaber (6/21/2011)
Jeff Moden (6/21/2011)
The problem that I'm becoming more and more aware of is that people really don't know how to run procs that contain xp_CmdShell without giving the proverbial...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 11:56 pm
opc.three (6/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 11:48 pm
Craig Farrell (6/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 10:47 pm
opc.three (6/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 9:46 pm
Craig Farrell (6/21/2011)
Craig Farrell (6/20/2011)
opc.three (6/20/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 9:19 pm
opc.three (6/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 9:12 pm
toddasd (6/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 5:33 pm
mvillar (6/21/2011)
Couldn't that kind of process be controlled completely outside of SQL Server?
Wouldn't it be easier to do it in .net?
well, it have a lot of uses, to do some...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 4:36 pm
opc.three (6/21/2011)
Jeff Moden (6/21/2011)
Craig Farrell (6/20/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 4:30 pm
mrngorickets (6/21/2011)
GilaMonster (4/3/2011)
Jeff Moden (4/3/2011)
GilaMonster (4/3/2011)
Please note: 3 year old thread.It doesn't matter on such timeless subjects.
I post those as a notification as to the original age so that people...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 21, 2011 at 8:31 am
Viewing 15 posts - 33,526 through 33,540 (of 59,099 total)