Viewing 15 posts - 33,271 through 33,285 (of 59,099 total)
mister.magoo (7/17/2011)
The Dixie Flatline (7/11/2011)
If anyone would post up some examples where a cursor solution outperforms a set-based solution, I will look at them respectfully.
Bob
This brought back memories of a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2011 at 6:57 pm
GPO (7/17/2011)
Re:
If anyone would post up some examples where a cursor solution outperforms a set-based solution, I will look at them respectfully.
Here's an interesting discussion I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2011 at 11:37 am
CELKO (7/16/2011)
Jeff, I now call the list of integers table the Series(seq) table because SEQUENCE is a reserved word for a new construct.
Hmmm... Joe, I have to ask... Since the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2011 at 8:50 am
SQLkiwi (7/16/2011)
IFOBJECT_ID(N'dbo.MyView', N'V')
IS NULL
EXECUTE ('CREATE VIEW dbo.MyView AS SELECT...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2011 at 8:16 am
opc.three...
IIRC, in the "CREATE or REPLACE" in Oracle (and, I believe, in the ANSI standard), the "REPLACE" is equivalent to an "ALTER".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 17, 2011 at 8:05 am
TravisDBA (7/16/2011)
Jeff Moden (7/16/2011)
TravisDBA (7/15/2011)
I'll take a good ADMIN over a good query person every time. 😀
I'm greedy... I want and get both in the same person. 🙂 It...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 16, 2011 at 11:08 pm
WayneS (7/15/2011)
Lynn Pettis (7/15/2011)
Chad Crawford (7/15/2011)
Craig Farrell (7/14/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 16, 2011 at 10:58 pm
TravisDBA (7/15/2011)
I'll take a good ADMIN over a good query person every time. 😀
I'm greedy... I want and get both in the same person. 🙂 It sometimes takes a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 16, 2011 at 11:18 am
kritika (7/14/2011)
all,,i got my solution... thanks newaz...
Very cool. Would you mind posting it so that others may learn from your experience, please?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 16, 2011 at 11:08 am
Correct me if I'm wrong, Joe, but the SEQUENCE construct is only new to SQL Server... it's been around in products, like Oracle, for a very long time.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 16, 2011 at 11:05 am
Except for in a function or view where you can't actually use a SET statement, I have no problem with the idea of setting DATEFIRST to whatever I need it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 15, 2011 at 8:30 pm
Nilesh Deshpande (6/28/2011)
I work on a sql server 2000 database at office and then at my residence.
Till now, when the database size was small enough, I used to do...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 15, 2011 at 8:23 pm
Thanks for posting what you found. I don't know much about SSIS and every bit helps.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 15, 2011 at 8:17 pm
Lonely Rogue (7/15/2011)
and any help on explaning about those switches.
Also, I should have set some background why I chose this approach... ok, here it is..
I need to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 15, 2011 at 8:13 pm
It looks like "Opening" is simply the difference between the previous "Opening" and the previous "Balance". Is that correct?
I also suggest that you read the article at the first...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 15, 2011 at 7:32 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 33,271 through 33,285 (of 59,099 total)