Viewing 15 posts - 32,686 through 32,700 (of 59,099 total)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (8/29/2011)
Anyone see plagiarism here:http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/context_info()/74332/
http://www.thecodepage.com/post/TIP-A-Call-Stack-in-SQL-Server.aspx
I wish I could say "Yes" to try to help the person feeling infringed upon but, No I don't. Not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 9:17 pm
GilaMonster (8/29/2011)
Jeff Moden (8/29/2011)
GilaMonster (8/29/2011)
mtillman-921105 (8/29/2011)
But communism is not seriously considered a real option anymore.
Come down and tell some people in government here that. It would come as a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 7:33 pm
Agreed... I should have been a bit more specific, Tom.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 7:22 pm
Alright... I'm trying to simulate what you might have for data just to be sure performance is ok so I need to ask just a couple of more questions.
On average...
1....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 7:18 pm
You only need 1 SELECT. Since you're also just checking for NULL values, you also don't need any CASE statements.
DECLARE @Name ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 4:35 pm
GilaMonster (8/29/2011)
mtillman-921105 (8/29/2011)
But communism is not seriously considered a real option anymore.Come down and tell some people in government here that. It would come as a revelation to them.
I'm...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 2:54 pm
Perfect. Now that I have that information, this is actually a fairly simple task. I'll work on it after work tonight.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 11:03 am
That's kind of what I'm suggesting, Henrik.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 8:30 am
GilaMonster (8/29/2011)
Brandie Tarvin (8/29/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 8:26 am
My opinion there is quite a bit different. You still have to write some pretty nasty stuff to effectively use the HierarchyID especially compared to using the Nested Set...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 29, 2011 at 8:22 am
Unless there's a pattern to the names, no.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 28, 2011 at 9:37 pm
Understood, but the infringer needs only file a counter notice and "boom", the ISP has to put the material back within 10-14 days. Sure, that's done under penalty of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 28, 2011 at 7:17 pm
henrik staun poulsen (8/24/2011)
Well, yes that might be true. But my meta data says that it is a float. So my transform job crashed.
With my improvement, the code continues...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 28, 2011 at 6:52 pm
uncle_boris (8/23/2011)
Unfortunately I do not know the technique or protocol to display two execution plans in this forum so they are viewable.
Run the code with the "Actual Execution Plan" turned...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 28, 2011 at 6:47 pm
Lynn Pettis (8/24/2011)
Jeff Moden (8/23/2011)
IceDread (8/23/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 28, 2011 at 5:30 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 32,686 through 32,700 (of 59,099 total)