Viewing 15 posts - 32,326 through 32,340 (of 59,099 total)
No... T-SQL isn't a good parsing tool for such a thing. What are you trying to parse out of the Text documents and what's the average length of these...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 4:34 pm
Performace Guard (Shehap) (10/9/2011)
update TableA SET COL4=COL2 from ( select col2,col3 from TableB )AS s INNER JOIN TableA...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 4:32 pm
ALZDBA (10/9/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 2:06 pm
Hmmm... Learning Service Broker would mean that I'd have to learn another SQL Server "4 letter word" 😛 but it does sound interesting. What I'd be most interested in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 12:13 pm
yubo1 (10/9/2011)
HI Jeff.Thanks a lot
You bet... thank you for taking it the right way.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 12:06 pm
Performace Guard (Shehap) (10/9/2011)
alter function dbo.Returnvalues (@string VARCHAR (50))
returns @TEMPTBALE table(newstring varchar (50))
as
begin
declare @value...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 12:00 pm
Jags2001 (10/9/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 11:48 am
David Moutray (10/9/2011)
Jeff Moden (10/9/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 11:43 am
David Moutray (10/9/2011)
I played around with it for a bit, and got it to work, though. Paste the XML into Notepad...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 11:38 am
Perhaps it's because I'm using SQL Server 2005 on a 9 year old, single CPU box, but I've tried the index suggestions from dmoutray's testing above, especially the 0 second...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 7:57 am
dmoutray (10/8/2011)
Just copy and paste the XML into SQL Server Management Studio to see the graphical execution plan.
That's just not working for me... is it because I'm using SQL Server...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 7:44 am
Interesting stuff (hang on a minute... gotta get this shoe out of my mouth... 🙂 there, that's better)... I wouldn't have believed that this query could ever be helped by...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 7:30 am
Gail Shaw and Paul Randall might disagree with both of us, Steve... something about the underlying allocation units and all that. But, I think they also might agree that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2011 at 7:03 am
NOW you've got the right idea! 🙂 And, thanks for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2011 at 10:35 pm
Performace Guard (Shehap) (10/7/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 8, 2011 at 10:33 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 32,326 through 32,340 (of 59,099 total)