Viewing 15 posts - 32,131 through 32,145 (of 59,099 total)
Kiara,
Any interest in a bit of table redesign that will greatly improve performance for this particular query? One that will give the reporting performance you seek without interfering with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2011 at 10:20 am
Gah... Now that I've had time to look at it, I see that my problem with generating the test data was that not all usages of the Tally Table were...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2011 at 4:20 pm
J Livingston SQL (10/28/2011)
have you any performance figs...you say your query is "slow"...based on the test data what response...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2011 at 12:42 pm
Nope. Good to go here. My only other question is how many rows does your test data jig create? I started it this morning in TempDB and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2011 at 11:47 am
ananda.murugesan (10/28/2011)
Hi,Table Name - EnergyMeter
Filed Name - Meter_Id
Total Records - 6
using stored procedure - how can read data for row 1, row 2, row 3 ...row 6.?
Thanks
ananda
For the information...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2011 at 8:12 am
CELKO (10/27/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2011 at 8:09 am
How many rows does the real table have? And I probably missed it above but what is the actual DDL for this table and any indexes it may have?...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2011 at 7:46 am
Ah... I see. You've changed the rules a bit.
Take the code I previously posted and make it match where OT_ID and NT_ID are equal instead of matching on RestOfData.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2011 at 7:47 pm
Ninja's_RGR'us (10/27/2011)
Hey Jeff, actually "xxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com" is a real mail :-D.I guess we're running out of those too!
BWAA-HAAA!!!! Seriously? That's just unbelievable. What will someone think of next? 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2011 at 7:36 pm
Evil Kraig F (10/27/2011)
Seeking fresh Beer Popsicle suppliers. The Dust Bunnies have gone on strike until I stock up...
😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2011 at 7:26 pm
Because a lot of Developers just want to get stuff off their plate, don't do peer reviews unless there's been some training as to what is expected in a peer...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2011 at 7:22 pm
You've made life entirely too difficult for yourself. 😉 Unless you're using xp_CmdShell, you shouldn't need a proxy user to do any of this. You don't need...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2011 at 5:39 pm
P.S. ... and no IMPERSONATE privs are required...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2011 at 3:57 pm
If the database is owned by SA, then "dbo" is actually "SA". Use EXECUTE AS OWNER within the proc and grant EXECUTE privs only to those users or roles...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 27, 2011 at 3:56 pm
jcrawf02 (10/26/2011)
what do you guys use for calendar apps?
My failing memory! 😛 The cool part about it is, I don't have to go to so many meetings that way....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 26, 2011 at 11:10 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 32,131 through 32,145 (of 59,099 total)