Viewing 15 posts - 31,126 through 31,140 (of 59,101 total)
Ummmm.... ok. I'm confused. You have the /QUIET switch set... why would you expect to see anything?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Koen Verbeeck (2/15/2012)
Jeff Moden (2/15/2012)
Are you really serious? You're generating a report with nearly 6 million lines of output? Who's going to read THAT?
Usually the business imports the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 4:29 pm
harpreets.singh (2/15/2012)
Hi Jeff,Try it and let me know if it works.
I have tested this script on several servers.
regards,
Harpreet
BWAAA-HAAA!!!! Not the way it works. Since you're the one...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 3:40 pm
ScottPletcher (2/15/2012)
Whether the number of rows, etc., met whatever magic criteria SQL went by -- which are not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 3:37 pm
Richard Moldwin (11/23/2005)
T-SQL programming involves a major loss of productivity, compared to any other modern language I know of.
I know it's a wicked old post but the comment above...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:51 pm
adeel.imtiaz (2/15/2012)
2. Query Monthly report(A1)[font="Arial Black"]with result in text[/font], this time it has taken...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:42 pm
isuckatsql (2/15/2012)
Thanks for your feedback!I thought that dynamic SQL was faster than 'normal' SQL, which was the reason for using it.
It seems to have made my queries faster!
It can appear...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:36 pm
jennigirl (1/18/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:29 pm
Gary Varga (2/15/2012)
Rod at work (2/14/2012)
jcb (2/14/2012)
Jeff Moden (2/13/2012)
...Heh... even without that bit of nightmarish code, I still find the same to be true... "sad bugs" and "bad coding".
Sure, someday...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:26 pm
jcb (2/14/2012)
But that remember me hot discussions with a team of old dogs.
Hey HEY!!! Be careful now! You're talking to an "old dog"! 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:24 pm
harpreets.singh (2/15/2012)
I tired to use powershell to get drive space info.
Did it work? 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:23 pm
ScottPletcher (2/15/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2012 at 12:21 pm
SQLKnowItAll (2/13/2012)
cw.izatt (2/13/2012)
Jeff Moden (1/9/2012)
Did you actually check for an absence of FKs or just an absence of PKs? I ask because UNIQUE constraints will suffice for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 14, 2012 at 7:22 pm
ScottPletcher (2/14/2012)
I referred to the clus index only. I assumed you can't control any other index(es), nor a heap (the ORDER BY would be irrelevant...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 14, 2012 at 6:58 pm
SQLKnowItAll (2/14/2012)
ScottPletcher (2/14/2012)
Be careful with phrasing: MSDN doesn't say it doesn't work, they say it's not guaranteed to work.
I believe that in this case, the clustered index is on the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 14, 2012 at 6:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 31,126 through 31,140 (of 59,101 total)