Viewing 15 posts - 31,081 through 31,095 (of 59,101 total)
Grant Fritchey (2/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (2/16/2012)
Grant Fritchey (2/16/2012)
Get a copy of Red Gate SQL Compare and just capture the data that exists in one database, but not the other. Very...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 4:10 pm
cw.izatt (2/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (2/16/2012)
cw.izatt (2/16/2012)
Why not? SQL is perfectly capable of handling it and if it is a dedicated SQL Server it is probably the best tool to use.
After...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 4:03 pm
tp 25072 (2/16/2012)
Very helpful, thank you.I constructed what I needed with your guidance.
It's traditional to post your final code so that someone else may benefit. Of course,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 4:00 pm
Revenant (2/16/2012)
- calling the shell is generally considered unsafe; and
I absolutely agree but only because most people don't take the time to set up for its use properly. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 3:54 pm
bbsr (2/16/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 3:53 pm
rabisco (2/16/2012)
I've figured out a few things to get me started.
From this
<body><p><a code1="111111"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 3:51 pm
SQLKnowItAll (2/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (2/16/2012)
SQLKnowItAll (2/16/2012)
cw.izatt (2/16/2012)
I agree with above, why handle all of that inside SQL?
Why not? SQL is perfectly capable of handling it and if it is a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 2:33 pm
bbsr (2/16/2012)
can i use this in a job and get the output of the stored procedure (which always returns 6 columns and 381 rows) to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 2:32 pm
cw.izatt (2/16/2012)
Why not? SQL is perfectly capable of handling it and if it is a dedicated SQL Server it is probably the best tool to use.
After thinking about it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 1:59 pm
SQLKnowItAll (2/16/2012)
cw.izatt (2/16/2012)
I agree with above, why handle all of that inside SQL?
Why not? SQL is perfectly capable of handling it and if it is a dedicated SQL Server...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 1:58 pm
bbsr (2/16/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 1:56 pm
chrisn-585491 (2/16/2012)
Damn, damn, damn!!!! They told me that there were only 2 rainbow pooping leprechauns when I bought them!
Better feed them lots of fiber, otherwise it will be Rainbow-By-Agonizing-Rainbow!...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 1:51 pm
Evil Kraig F (2/16/2012)
Jeff Moden (2/13/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 1:46 pm
Koen Verbeeck (2/16/2012)
(stupid American car :-P)
BWWAAA-HAAAA!!!! They're made from mostly foreign parts. 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 12:01 pm
sharon-472085 (2/16/2012)
maybe some one can help me:
i was ask to summarize column on sql table :
1
2
3
7
8
sum=21
without using sum() function ,without loop, without cursor ,without using any ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2012 at 7:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31,081 through 31,095 (of 59,101 total)