Viewing 15 posts - 30,901 through 30,915 (of 59,101 total)
abhilasht (3/4/2012)
Yes PIVOT is the best
Actually, it's not. See the article at the following link for why not. Pay particular attention to the performance chart at the end...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2012 at 7:36 am
Golden_Behzad (3/3/2012)
for change pk and fk datatype is very heavy...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2012 at 12:00 am
Heh... {FacePalm}... {Self Head Slap}... {pound head against hard spot on desk}. I've really got to learn to scroll further down in code windows. I didn't see the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 11:38 pm
J Livingston SQL (3/3/2012)
R.P.Rozema (3/3/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 11:33 pm
siva 20997 (3/3/2012)
hence I just touched upon the subjects which is needed to be understood to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 11:29 pm
J Livingston SQL (3/3/2012)
R.P.Rozema (3/3/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 11:21 pm
siva 20997 (3/3/2012)
I am new to your Forum and didnt notice who is who etc
There are few additional things i...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 11:17 pm
siva 20997 (3/3/2012)
sorry I didnt notice that you were part of the SSC Moderators etc
Can I eMail you the answer and then you can cut and paste whatever you think...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 11:10 pm
Golden_Behzad (3/3/2012)
i write more description for my problem
i need function that generate sequence uniqueidentifier
i write function that usefull but not 100% sequence
(data type...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 11:06 pm
Also, please define what you mean by "oldest No".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 10:01 am
cchitanu (4/28/2004)
Send me an email at cchitanu@csc.com
How'z'bout you just post your solution here, instead? 😉
{EDIT}... heh... 8 year old post. I'd still like to see what was going to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 9:50 am
siva 20997 (3/3/2012)
use a query which will...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 9:49 am
SQL_Surfer (3/2/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 9:41 am
That would be a "sequence" function and, in SQL Server 2000, it's just about (I try to not say "NOT" or "NEVER" :-D) impossible to do because it would also...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2012 at 9:28 am
Shree-903371 (3/2/2012)
The problem is we are not allowed to use open queries in out campany.
What do you mean by "open queries"??? Do you mean "dynamic SQL"? If so, then...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 2, 2012 at 2:48 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 30,901 through 30,915 (of 59,101 total)