Viewing 15 posts - 27,901 through 27,915 (of 59,101 total)
gantavasu (12/10/2012)
Here for blocking we need to kill the sp id.how to solve the deadlock issue.
It's normally not a simple thing and it's far too complex to explain on a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2012 at 8:47 am
sgmunson (12/10/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2012 at 8:45 am
The reason why I use T-SQL for this is because it's frequently much better to do things there. So much so that a lot of people will build "Execute...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2012 at 7:41 am
10e5x (12/10/2012)
So now my first task will be go google research on how to write stored procedure in SSIS? Am I right?
Oh my. As you said, you really...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2012 at 7:32 am
davoscollective (12/9/2012)
Jeff Moden (12/7/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2012 at 6:33 am
GilaMonster (12/10/2012)
Jeff Moden (12/9/2012)
GilaMonster (12/9/2012)
No.Page reads != fragmentation.
Do you consider page splits to be a form of fragmentation?
Page splits may cause logical fragmentation (or may not, depending which pages...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2012 at 6:08 am
10e5x (12/9/2012)
HOLY MAMA!!! Omg how did that even come about? Its my third time reading your method and i am still like circling around the forest. Thats way too...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 10, 2012 at 5:56 am
GilaMonster (12/9/2012)
No.Page reads != fragmentation.
Do you consider page splits to be a form of fragmentation?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 9, 2012 at 4:33 pm
mah_j (12/9/2012)
Due to the increases in page reads counter in performance monitor(during the time out) I think the problem is fragmentation.I will check the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 9, 2012 at 4:32 pm
CELKO (12/9/2012)
Regarding your ANSI/ISO INSERT INTO comment, unless I'm mistaken, your suggestion only works on 2008 or higher. The DATE data type is also not a valid 2005...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 9, 2012 at 4:16 pm
Here's one possible answer...
Assuming the "ACCESS_SOURCE" is a table, we need to first combine the Event_D and Event_T columns into a single, sortable, calculable column. This should have been...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 9, 2012 at 12:54 pm
So what do you want to do if there's an access late in the day and no exit until the next day?
Also, what do you want CONSECUTIVE_D to be if...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 9, 2012 at 10:06 am
As a side bar, I recommend adding SET NOCOUNT ON at the beginning of each trigger so that it suppresses all of that unnecessary IO. To wit, sometimes a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 8, 2012 at 11:00 pm
LightningFingers (12/1/2010)
I'm using LINQ to SQL, but I think this question may apply to any ORM tool.
Then, you have a much more insideous problem to watch for. If you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 8, 2012 at 10:52 pm
LightningFingers (12/2/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 8, 2012 at 10:48 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 27,901 through 27,915 (of 59,101 total)