Viewing 15 posts - 27,376 through 27,390 (of 59,101 total)
TheSQLGuru (2/28/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 1, 2013 at 12:16 am
Actually, the change of an index CAN very much change the result especially where UPDATEs are concerned.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 1, 2013 at 12:07 am
Heh... my goodness. Why would anyone consider being "stuck" in SQL Server being "stuck"? I actually gave up the front-end world (11 years ago) to work almost exclusively...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 1, 2013 at 12:04 am
SpringTownDBA (2/27/2013)
Jeff Moden (2/27/2013)
SQL Pizza (2/27/2013)
Got a lot of SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELDS-waits and a very high signal time. Could it also be possible, that we just need more CPUs?
As Gail has already...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 28, 2013 at 11:55 pm
I think the most important part of the article has been overlooked by those rightfully aghast at yet another seemingly “interview question” article. Here’s the quote. The emphasis...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 28, 2013 at 10:50 pm
And now we know why I asked. 🙂 There's always more behind these types of requests. Thanks you very much for taking the time to post the business...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 28, 2013 at 9:18 am
mickyT (2/27/2013)
Why? Please don't say "for performance reasons" until you've actually tested it. I tested all of the solutions offered so far and there's virtually no difference. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 11:10 pm
"It Depends". What is your passion?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 11:08 pm
knakka 14475 (2/27/2013)
I have no clue how this works.. :blink:Pls could u break it down as to how can i use it
The article at the following link explains how a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 10:23 pm
josetur12 (2/27/2013)
I need to get the last value regardless of the actual date.I tried both solutions and both work.
Thank you.
You might also want to consider changing the structure of the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 10:19 pm
daglugub 60457 (2/27/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 10:13 pm
Jon.Morisi (2/27/2013)
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_table_col1_col2] ON [dbo].
(
[col1] ASC,
[col2] ASC
)
WITH (SORT_IN_TEMPDB...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 10:06 pm
CapnHector (2/27/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 10:04 pm
winmansoft (2/27/2013)
You mean "select min([date]) from entries WHERE [date] BETWEEN '01-Jan-2012' and '20-Jan-2013'"? But we want to select minimum from to 100 rows
Then add the TOP and the ORDER BY...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 9:58 pm
RZ52 (2/27/2013)
I have a data structure as followed : [Name], [Task] and the data is :
John, task1
John, task2
Joe, task1
Joe, task3
Joe, task4
Jane, task1
Jane, task4
..........
I wonder how to use the 'SELECT' to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 27, 2013 at 9:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 27,376 through 27,390 (of 59,101 total)