Viewing 15 posts - 27,331 through 27,345 (of 59,101 total)
Lynn Pettis (3/3/2013)
WITH TableA_CTE AS(
SELECT TOP (@TOP_HANDLED_ROWS)
TableAID,
TableAStatusTypeID,
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 5:20 pm
P.S. Let's hope the Microsoft never fixes the "silent truncation" problem. I rely on it a whole lot! š
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 5:16 pm
Lynn Pettis (3/3/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 5:06 pm
In this case, the silent truncation is actually a desirable thing. I just think it odd that Scott would favor this particular method because someone not-in-the-know would have to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 4:48 pm
Of course, if none of that works, FedEx and a swing-set of disks works wonders. In a previous job, I was able to get a portable hard disk on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 4:44 pm
polkadot (3/3/2013)
Well, Joe Celko forewarded the book. I would have...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 4:38 pm
leonmccalla (3/3/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 4:20 pm
Geoff A (3/3/2013)
Jeff Moden (2/28/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 4:04 pm
polkadot (3/3/2013)
Can anyone explain the reason K.H. may have shown one supposedly working example without the "SELECT seq=IDENTITY(int)" and one with?
Yes. It's easy. He made a mistake. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 3:52 pm
polkadot (2/25/2013)
I double and triple checked the book and the WHILE query in my original post is a facsimile.
The where clause condition is slightly different, it excludes o1.supervisor<>o1.employee. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 3:49 pm
Joe.Spitler (2/26/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 1:27 pm
I guess my take on SSDs would be that they're likely perfect for TempDB. As previously mentioned, they may also be perfect for a database other than TempDB if...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 1:17 pm
The first query in the deadlock will very likely have a full table or index scan because of the non-SARGable criteria you wrote for the wait-time. Because you used...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 1:00 pm
mayur birari (2/28/2013)
From the plan, it can be seen that the new index is used. It also saves an extra Sort operation on the tvp.
HOW is the index ACTUALLY being...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 12:06 pm
You could split the backups to multiple files which would make smaller files. Although it does take a while, you can also zip the files which will give you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2013 at 11:55 am
Viewing 15 posts - 27,331 through 27,345 (of 59,101 total)