Viewing 15 posts - 26,341 through 26,355 (of 59,099 total)
Nassan (7/30/2013)
every day I dont want to be in criss mood while I'm working because someone else mistakes is what I'm fixing most of the time...
Although not always the case,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2013 at 3:29 pm
I guess my question would be, why do you need a function to do this when the inline code is so easy?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2013 at 2:46 pm
Lowell (7/30/2013)
I just keep adding to it as...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 30, 2013 at 7:39 am
Eugene Elutin (7/29/2013)
Jeff Moden (7/29/2013)
Eugene Elutin (7/29/2013)
Solomon Rutzky (7/27/2013)
23847234872893475983479583749583749573945739 is all digits, is a valid number, but is NOT convertible to any SQL Server number types as it is larger...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 29, 2013 at 8:53 am
I absolutely agree with Erland. There are dozens of ways to skin this cat and this is an excellent opportunity to compare the different methods and learn their strengths...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 29, 2013 at 7:49 am
I just took a look at the home page for the first time this morning. Why in the hell do people think that change is always for the better?...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 29, 2013 at 7:44 am
ben.brugman (7/29/2013)
Jeff Moden (7/26/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 29, 2013 at 7:31 am
Eugene Elutin (7/29/2013)
Solomon Rutzky (7/27/2013)
- 23847234872893475983479583749583749573945739 is all digits, is a valid number, but is NOT convertible to any SQL Server number types as it is larger than 38 digits
...
You can...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 29, 2013 at 7:23 am
paul.knibbs (6/26/2013)
Jeff Moden (6/25/2013)
No. NULLs cannot be compared to so they would also be excluded from any check for <> 0. Try it an see.
I would tend to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2013 at 9:19 pm
Hooray! The "old look" is back! 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2013 at 9:06 pm
vshiva2379 (7/28/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2013 at 9:03 pm
Wesley.Groleau (7/28/2013)
Jeff Moden (7/27/2013)
Wesley.Groleau (7/27/2013)
(snip) Sure, a stored procedure CAN do it, but a script component or other CLR is easier. (snip)
I guess my question would be, why do you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm
zqckfair (7/28/2013)
Thank you for this very well explained answer and that useful link.
Sorry for the ambiguity, but unfortunately I'm also having problem with the import, in fact, it is my...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2013 at 6:53 pm
I'm assuming that you've already imported the data into a staging or other table. If you're also having problems with the import, we need to know what is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2013 at 7:14 am
vshiva2379 (7/28/2013)
Since you did not understand i how given that data and more over i do not want to disclose my original data i have given that, if...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 28, 2013 at 6:31 am
Viewing 15 posts - 26,341 through 26,355 (of 59,099 total)