Viewing 15 posts - 25,576 through 25,590 (of 59,102 total)
Let’s get something straight: if you’re a Microsoft shop, or you’re loading data to MS SQL – SSIS is the way to go.
I hope you don't mind if I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 22, 2013 at 4:13 pm
polkadot (10/21/2013)
ok it was char(13). OK, thanks so much to both of you. Two replaces resolves the leading white spaces.
Ugh! 🙂 CHAR(13) is a carriage return. Sounds...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 22, 2013 at 3:26 pm
GilaMonster (10/22/2013)
DBCC CheckDB (<database name>) WITH NO_INFOMSGS, ALL_ERRORMSGS
I'd still remove the nolocks, they definitely can cause you problems, by design they can result in incorrect data. As I said, not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 22, 2013 at 3:13 pm
- Win (10/21/2013)
Happy to see your response on this. I have couple of questions.
What do you mean ?
What should I understand with your response, the last lines ?
SSNs...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 22, 2013 at 2:14 pm
L' Eomot Inversé (10/21/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 4:51 pm
Keith Tate (10/21/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 4:38 pm
josh 92884 (10/21/2013)
I have a table on a MSSQL 2000 with about 4700 rows.
My query:
SELECT * FROM...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 4:28 pm
Everything has a "tipping point". 1 Extra row can cause an execution plan to change drastically.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 2:36 pm
This sounds like the perfect task for Nested Sets. Looking forward to readily consumable sample data for this problem.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 2:23 pm
Are the indexes and stats actually being rebuilt on the secondary?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 2:18 pm
jonysuise (10/21/2013)
Hi SSC Journeyman, 😀Maybe another approach could be partitionning your table.
Hope it helps. 😎
+1. You beat me to the punch on that one. I'm going through that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 2:16 pm
sqlserver12345 (10/21/2013)
nothing just ...just learning some coding
In that case, I strongly recommend that you drop the whole idea of using a WHILE loop and not using REVERSE. Might as...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 1:31 pm
hoseam (10/21/2013)
I tried to use SQL Server Import and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 9:04 am
blasto_max (10/20/2013)
Koen Verbeeck (10/20/2013)
DO NOT USE SSIS FOR THIS.
Use dynamic SQL for this (as Jeff mentioned).
If I would need to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2013 at 8:23 am
dwain.c (10/20/2013)
sqlserver12345 (10/20/2013)
I do not want to use reverse function.please check the code I posted and correct what wrong I did.thanks
That's exactly what we're doing by showing you the right...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2013 at 8:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 25,576 through 25,590 (of 59,102 total)