Viewing 15 posts - 23,731 through 23,745 (of 59,102 total)
Eirikur Eiriksson (5/4/2014)
thava (5/3/2014)
hi,hope everybody doing good,
here is my problem this is my data
The problem is in the data, each node can only have one parent!
😎
For classic...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2014 at 7:40 pm
GilaMonster (5/4/2014)
Jeff Moden (5/3/2014)
if you use the COPY ONLY option on the NUL backup tests, the test won't interfere with the Point-In-Time backups.You mean they won't interfere with differentials 🙂
I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2014 at 7:22 pm
thomashohner (5/4/2014)
Do you use a While Loop or Recursive CTE to make your test data?
Niether, I spent this time researching how to do this and stumbled on a article by...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2014 at 6:59 pm
thomashohner (5/4/2014)
On the million record test data... I know what I'm doing today:-D
Do you use a While Loop or Recursive CTE to make your test data?
Thanks so much for your...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2014 at 12:23 pm
If you're nervous about living up to expectations, then you're well on your way to being one of the "big boys". Keep reading about SQL Server. If you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2014 at 12:02 am
Jim P. (5/1/2014)
Yet Another DBA (5/1/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2014 at 11:49 pm
Sean Lange (4/30/2014)
Jeremy Brown (4/30/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2014 at 11:21 pm
BTW and I'm sure that someone else already thought about it and just hasn't posted it, yet... if you use the COPY ONLY option on the NUL backup tests, the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2014 at 5:07 pm
Thanks Gail. That's a pretty cool thing then. Hat's off to whomever came up with it.
Shifting gears, we're working with a database that's only about 310GB... if nothing...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Andrew G (4/30/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2014 at 4:03 pm
I think a much better question would be, "What determines what will be the first (top) table (according to books online) in a hash match join"? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2014 at 1:32 pm
yuvipoy (4/8/2014)
Jeff Moden (4/5/2014)
The easiest way would be to open the tables in the design mode of SSMS and look at the FK's.
This will give about the sigle relationship, i...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2014 at 7:11 am
lsatchell (5/1/2014)
Come on guys, a circa 2010 solution featuring a VBscript!? Where's the powershell updated equivalent? ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 2, 2014 at 8:24 am
eseeweb (4/30/2014)
I just have an update that we don't need to delete the record from the table as long as every time a record inserted can be write to a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2014 at 12:57 pm
Eirikur Eiriksson (4/30/2014)
INNER JOIN NUMBERS NMON LEN(MT.MYTEMP_STR) <= NM.N
I'm thinking that bit of code cannot possibly be correct even for the old versions.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2014 at 12:52 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 23,731 through 23,745 (of 59,102 total)