Viewing 15 posts - 22,636 through 22,650 (of 59,067 total)
To be honest and despite the best intentions of people doing such things, I'm afraid... very afraid.
Look at what went on just this last year. How many companies data...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 4, 2014 at 11:30 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (10/4/2014)
Jeff Moden (10/3/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 4, 2014 at 10:10 pm
rodjkidd (10/4/2014)
Early start, have coffee, seen some familiar faces, so going well so far!
Any one got a heckle for Grant? 🙂
Jeff talking of wanting...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 4, 2014 at 10:08 pm
Probably not. And, you don't usually need to use CONVERT to cast a VARCHAR to a DATETIme when you're using things like DATEDIFF.
What you do need to do, though,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 10:32 pm
gyerena (10/2/2014)
I have this doubt. I've found different answers for this question in the web. A fast_forward cursor is read only by definition, meaning the rows can't be...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 9:49 pm
Not everyone can afford the luxury of multiple boxes even if they're VM but I keep a Dev, Staging, and Prod systems up and running at all times. My...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 9:46 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (10/3/2014)
Jeff Moden (10/3/2014)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 9:12 pm
stephen.long.1 (10/3/2014)
Jeff,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 9:10 pm
I'm in Pittsburgh for SQL Saturday 315 and I just got a PM from "Luke L" (one of the older members of SQL Server Central that's been laying low lately)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 8:55 pm
Heh... the correct answer isn't actually listed. Answer "D" should be "During the mandatory peer review, you get a trip to the woodshed for a porkchop dinner for writing...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 7:43 am
Ok.... I've studied your code and tables a bit. Let's peel one potato at a time...
First, I see no need for the explicit transaction. Getting rid of that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2014 at 12:24 am
Stamey (10/2/2014)
In a perfect world this never would have happened. In my world, ruled by management, I can only be as heavy-handed as they will allow me. My first suggestion...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2014 at 10:45 pm
dwain.c (10/2/2014)
DonlSimpson (10/2/2014)
declare @t varchar(5000) = 'RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row." This-divided-by,that|&/multiplied\by(100)give*you,%;<percent>.'
declare @s-2...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2014 at 10:37 pm
Thanks for the feedback, Tom. And, yeah... I wish more managers "got it".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2014 at 10:28 pm
You bet. Thank you for the feedback. They should be able to do everything they need to with those privs.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2014 at 9:55 am
Viewing 15 posts - 22,636 through 22,650 (of 59,067 total)