Viewing 15 posts - 19,141 through 19,155 (of 59,098 total)
ChrisM@Work (11/19/2015)
Always test:
+1000
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 11:09 am
cory.bullard76 (11/19/2015)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 11:05 am
Ya just gotta love the way people come together to simplify things on some of these posts. Thanks folks.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 10:53 am
Robert vd Berg (11/19/2015)
Is this what your looking for?SELECTdbo.agent_datetime(run_date, run_time)
FROMsysjobhistory;
You beat me to it. It's not the epitome of efficiency but it's usually good enough. Luis' "iSF" would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 9:13 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (11/19/2015)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 9:11 am
Easy guys. 'Tis the season to be jolly. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 9:09 am
I don't mean this as a slam. It's a recommendation. This is some pretty basic stuff that you're talking about and, if your job requires you to work...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 8:45 am
ChrisM@Work (11/19/2015)
--===== If it exists, drop the test table to make reruns easier in SSMS.
-- This is NOT a part of the solution.
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#TestTable','U') IS NOT...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 7:00 am
serg-52 (11/19/2015)
Jeff Moden (11/18/2015)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 6:54 am
Jason-299789 (11/19/2015)
I dont think Lead/Lag will help in this case as it will only update by a given offset, so using the example
SELECT
#TestTable.*
,LEAD(class4,1,class4) OVER (PARTITION BY identifier ORDER...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 19, 2015 at 6:51 am
For future posts, please help us help you. Please read the article at the first link under "Helpful Links" in my signature line at the end of this post....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 18, 2015 at 10:25 pm
For future posts, help make it easy for people to help you. Please see the first link under "Helpful Links" in my signature line at the end of this...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 18, 2015 at 9:15 pm
Luis Cazares (11/18/2015)
Carlo Romagnano (11/18/2015)
patricklambin (11/18/2015)
I would advice to prohibit this way of coding/naming.
I disagree, naming conventions should reflect the factory needs. So, it may be that [Sales.XXX] is good...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 18, 2015 at 8:47 pm
SoHelpMeCodd (11/18/2015)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 18, 2015 at 8:34 pm
SQLBill (10/28/2015)
Jeff Moden (10/26/2015)
SQLBill (10/26/2015)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 18, 2015 at 6:23 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 19,141 through 19,155 (of 59,098 total)